Thomas Malloy wrote:-
<<Dennis Prager just mentioned this article on his show. It's author sites
the work of another of the climate scientists whose conclusions Nick
Palmer questions...snip rhetoric
http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175 >>
This climate scientist mentioned - R. Timothy Patterson - is one of the top
60 "deniers". I read the linked to "Investors Business Daily" editorial (and
the 9 very similar they have printed on global warming since December). I
thought the Wall Street Journal was bad!! I cannot remember seeing such
concentrated idiocy or twisted duplicitousness or, to be as absolutely
"positive" as I can be, extreme wishful thinking in this arena before. These
guys are morons or corrupt or evil or having a (non funny) laugh or
something because they sure as hell don't make sense except to true believer
denialists. I find it extremely hard to believe that anyone with even half a
brain could be so off base as these twits.
Nick Palmer
P.S. Thomas, I'm still replying to your last email but I'm a bit busy at the
moment. I have to say you're proving to be a tough nut to crack but I don't
think I've had to deal with "faith" based denialism before!
