On 2/22/08, Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > negative inventor syndrome attitude you seem to emote in your post, >
Please clarify. 'Inventor syndrome' can refer to various inventor issues and I'm not quite sure I appreciate how 'inventor syndrome' would be different to 'negative inventor syndrome' and finally I am not sure what in my posts you are referring to as emoting this quality. Regarding the paradox I managed to simulate it with vizimag and the results were that a hoop coil over a toroid core acted as if the coil was toroidal not hoop. And long or toroidal elctromagnets field strength is not effected by diameter. I was also able to bust the O/U transformer idea I had (not the same as the paradox really), although for the record I still think that it is possible to have unidirectional coupling in a transformer only not by the method I was investigating. I actually believe most of the famous solid state FE (and some rotating) devices rely on an ability to dramatically increase otherwise very loose coupling in one direction by use of the aether. Having disproven yet another 'logic' based idea I am returning to my previous position that the only way to make energy is by using the aether (the board on which we play the game, if you can change the board you can change the rules) and (with only one possible exception) you can't create energy by finding 'holes' in basic physics. John Berry
