----- Original Message ----
From: R C Macaulay 

> because it's  " too big to fail".  Translation..  when there is $ 550 
> trillion dollars in funny money (derivitives) in play out there ...

Isn't "too big to fail" just another mantra (a "lie which to big to admit-to" 
so we make it into dogma) ... i.e a dogma of the modern "religion"  which will 
become the NWO ?....kinda like the other mantra: "we're now a service economy 
and manufacturing jobs don't matter" or "international trade" (sending our jobs 
to China) makes us all stronger".

Think about it ! What a sadly warped version of "Fordism" ! ... and we are 
being seduced-by these NWO controllers, almost without a whimper. By acting as 
if they are really only pushing "traditional" religion, they have instead been 
installing just the opposite.

How many Vorticians remember Fordism? It occurred to me recently, after talking 
to some college students, that one reason that such topics as the "New World 
Order" are not especially frightening to the younger generation goes back to 
the ultra-bland "required reading" lists in public schools these days. We seem 
to be systematically  taking all levels of any uncomfortable - the "literary 
angst" out of the curriculum. For better or for worse.

Huxley may no longer be on the reading list- too controversial, nor George 
Orwell nor Anthony Burgess, but instead we will find purple tripe by Alice 
Walker, and other noxious reading so espoused by Oprah, some of which can even 
win a Pulitzer. Go figure. 

Bottom line: We do not want to challenge young minds, or even suggest  the very 
real prospect that the future may NOT be very enticing, nor even preferable to 
the recent past, do we? 

The World State envisioned by Huxley is the kind of a prototype for the NWO, 
except that they  deal with the problem of demeaning work (i.e. manufacturing 
jobs) differently. After all, in the rejected novel, society is built around 
the principles of Henry 
Ford, who has become a Messianic figure in this brave dystopia.  IOW - Instead 
of opting for a blatant lie, like the desirability of a "service economy" 
Huxley manages to morally justify a permanent (nonrobotic) "working caste" i.e. 
the "deltas," which is the product of selective degenerate breeding, not 
computer technology. 

It is either "curious" or evidence of little foresight- that the possibility of 
'thinking machines' was "too far out there" just 75 years ago,\ ... or else in 
hindsight, the installation of a hybridized human sub-class was deemed the most 
efficient way to handle the situation.

Anyway one feature of the Fordism style of dystopia is that from birth, the 
various castes- alphas on down, are indoctrinated by recorded voices repeating 
the appropriate slogans for their group while they sleep (called "hypnopaedia" 
in BNW) which along with their version of prozac:  "soma" becomes the new 
"sacrament" for class harmony. 

Wiki of course has an appropriate entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep-learning

Although BNW is most definitely a dystopia, I am not entirely sure that in a 
few ways, it does not have features which are preferable to our modern evolving 
version of the NWO - at least as it is being promoted behind the scenes by Wall 
Street and by their most trusted allies, the Bush NeoCons. And yes, Robin, in 
this regard, Bush is probably a "plant" in that he is largely unaware of how 
his personal vision of Utopia has been distorted by these financial geniuses 
and string-pullers. 

That is to say, he was most likely "chosen" for the job....

Jones



Reply via email to