Unlike Jackson Browne, I am not yet "running on empty"
but at "$4 per" it may not be long... 

Anyway ... glad I am not being charged a keyboard tax
as the following longish post may sound like a
"run-on" of some past postings about water-based
fuels; but it does contain one new additional and
important factoid (or fantasy)... making it newsworthy
for some far-sighted observers.

It has been mentioned before by several others
(meaning that it is not total fantasy) that even if
one must generally subscribe to, and obey "the Law"
i.e. the LoT .... it is still possible that a "motive
force" capable of propelling an automobile, is
possible from ZPE. 

In this case the ZPE is manifested through 'premature'
*phase change* ... and not just any phase-change. 

It must be a phase-change from liquid to a pressurized
gas BUT it must be "nearly" entropic (i.e. isothermal)
phase-change, in which there is no (only slight) heat
being released. IOW there is lots of violent pressure,
but little heat. This part is real science.

Here is a prior posting on "entropic explosion"

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg15958.html

Here is a prior posting on "light without heat":

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16063.html



The following is a refinement of the idea that a rapid
phase-change from liquid to gas, without corresponding
heat release could be accomplished "on the fly" and
with dramatic consequences ...

IOW that it is possible (in theory) that a liquid
which is made "on the fly" or in situ from stored
components (one of which IS a compressed gas so the
result is not the full effect) ... can be expanded,
and specifically expanded through a turbine (exactly
like compressed air) ... and thereby provide motive
force without corresponding heat (and could even
provide secondary cooling, exactly like compressed
air)... but with about a 4:1 advantage in terms of net
efficiency of the total system (over compressed air).

...i.e., unlike compressing air alone (which is lossy)
this system does NOT require the same net energy input
due to 
a.) liquid water being half the equation, 
b.) super-oxidation supplying some heat 
c.) ZPE enhanced phase-change. 

All liquids until they reach phase-change into gas,
contain this "hidden" amount of vapor pressure, which
is a form of free-energy when isothermal. Trioxide may
be the best manifestation of this free-energy. When
phase change is expedited isothermally, there WILL BE
a ZPE (Casimir-like) input.

This suggested system will NOT work with peroxide,
which can only be made slowly and carefully, due to
lack of stoichometric ratio balancing - so there is
only one other candidate in all of nature; at least
only one which is potentially cheap: "trioxide"
(dihydrogen trioxide)

So-called "super-oxidation" has been considered a
possible gateway towards increased efficiency in
combustion, such as in automotive engines -- and also
for water purification.

Ozone, chlorine and peroxide are dangerous oxidants
like dihydrogen trioxide H2O3, but expensive. Few
things in life are cheaper than mixing oxygen and
water in equal parts...

Trioxide has been called by some biologists a "new"
oxidant (as in "new to me") ... but it is actually as
old as life itself, and is probably found in the
metabolism of all single celled lifeforms. But until
the last decade few biologists appreciated the
magnitude of its role. That is because it has a short
lifetime: "short" as in subsecond but not ultrashort
as in nanosecond. 

But on the plus side, trioxide can be, and is
routinely "manufactured" by living cells in
microseconds from only air and water, and with minimum
energy input.

http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/hydrogen-trioxide/

Now... in the spirit of biomimicry - if one could just
get the two molecules: O2 and H2O to 'stick together'
for about 10-50 milliseconds after they are formed, in
say- the fuel injector of a diesel engine, then
dihydrogen trioxide could become a potential "fuel"
since it violently flashes from liquid to "cold steam"
on decomposition, similar to peroxide. 

Although there is lots of phase-change into what looks
like steam, there is also lots of entrained water mist
(not true vapor), and the entrained water mist itself
is "chilled" so that the net heat gain in the exhaust
is negligible, even though there is a strong motive
force, even a violent explosion which can be deadly.

Peroxide is dangerous. I can vouch for that from
personal experience, having lost a decent old pickup
truck due to an explosion that should not have
happened. If you get over about 35% enrichment the
peroxide is called HTP and is unpredictably explosive,
but still without corresponding heat given off. 

However, if peroxide -- or any such entropic-explosive
could be made 'on the fly' and cheaply, and never
stored in bulk, then it would be ideal - but HOOH
cannot be made this way, IMHO. 

However, H2O3 is still a viable candidate for this
concept - if -  a strong magnetic field is available.
This would need to be about 4 T and up (guesstimate):
much stronger than what is available from permanent
magnets. Argon must also be present.

H2O3 is interesting metastable oxidant molecule,
having the theoretical potential to achieve a measure
of "free-energy" in the form of a motive force which
does not violate the LoT - due to the ease (low
barrier) of formation (on paper and proven in
biology). It is, of course, the very simple molar
combination of water and oxygen under the kind of
effective high-pressure that can occur within cellular
membranes. 

H2O + O2 --> H2O3

... and it has increased stability when seven
molecules form into a ring -- not unlike the six-fold
symmetry of ice. But even so, it is never very stable
... which can be a good thing, if you can control its
formation and the immediate aftermath of its decay
into cold steam.

There is a better known sub-field of chemistry known
as "Peroxone chemistry": which involves the formation
of H2O3 from ozone and peroxide and vice-versa... 

... but the $64 question for alternative-energy
aficionados: is there a simpler and more direct route
to H2O3. which does not demand ozone or peroxide as
the feedstock ?

Recently several researchers: Xu, Xin, Goddard, et al.
have claimed that that in biology, some cells can form
form H2O2 rapidly via the formation of the metastable
H2O3 species from water and air, which then reacts
with a second molecule of H2O3 to form H2O2. The cells
obtain the H2O3 almost for free (thermodynamically)
due to low energy of formation, but catch-22 it cannot
be stored.

The authors show that in an *argon matrix* it is
favorable (3.5 kcal/mol barrier) for the reactants to
form a hydrogen-bonded complex, a seven-membered ring.
If the argon works due to inertness and its precise
dimension, in cells then it is possible that it will
work in a biomimicry process. 

If you are alert in imagining the "possibilities" you
have probably surmised that argon and oxygen can be
enriched from air, and stored under high pressure in
scuba tanks, for instance, and then combined with
water at the turbine manifold to first form trioxide
(with an electrical input) and then to expand and
flash the trioxide. A rough estimate comparing this
kind of "fuel" to compressed-air (Guy Nègre's concept)
is about a 4:1 energy advantage.

More details to follow ....

Jones

BTW - there is at least one Vortician in Texas, who is
knee-deep in the water purification 'bidness' (that is
the way they sometimes pronounce 'business' down thar
in the Lone Star) who might be rather interested in
trioxide for reasons other than alternative energy ...


...but it is also curious that pure water and
alternative energy often seem to be linked at the hip,
so to speak...


Reply via email to