On Jul 16, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Claim:
Cell size: 62.5" x 32.5" = 2031.3 sq in = 1.31 sq m
2800 W / 1.31 sq m = 2137.4 W/m^2
(1) Standard Test Conditions (STC) of 1000 Watts per square meter
irradiance, air mass of 1.5, 25oC cell temperature used in lab
testing and
rating of photovoltaic modules.
Performance: Pout/Pin => (2137.4 W/m^2) / (1000 W/m^2) => 214 % eff.
Remarkable!!
Terry
Yup. I already remarked on it in fact, that FreEnergy can't do the
basic math, thus proving your point that it is indeed remarkable, but
my English aren't going that can happen so good. 8^)
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:38 AM, thomas malloy wrote:
I just received a Power Point Presentation from FreEnergy. They
claim to have a new solar technology called MEL. It is said to be
70% efficient. Existing solar cells are 17% efficient. They say
that their cells will be cheaper too. A 62" X 32" panel is
supposed to produce 3 KW.
Can't do basic math I would guess. That's over 200% efficient.
Only way that's going that can happen is if the cell is illuminated
by reflectors, thus increasing the "size".
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
