The following "peer" review came back from SPSIF. "Your paper presents an interesting theory. However, in its current form there is no clear path to your conclusions. That is, there is not enough information presented to convince the SPESIF reviewers of its validity. " It is clear that they don't believe in my work and never will. Better writing is not going to fix this. I cannot prove anything. I can only submit evidence. There is someone in between who wants to give me a chance. He suggests such things as a shorter abstract, a formal introduction, and so forth. I don't know how much power he has. The fact is SPESIF reviewers are not convinced and they never will be. Meanwhile the ice caps melt away. I have not withdrawn my paper yet. I may not bother to submit an amended draft. The paper I sent in is the best I can do.. I know from experience that the next "peer" review will not be any better. The same thing happed at the Canadian Journal of Physics about 4 years ago. I withdrew my paper, put my books away, and moved on with my life. I believed that this thing would be different. I started studying again. I should have known better. Frank Znidarsic
**************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )
