Terry Blanton wrote:
The inbreeding in North Georgia is getting out of hand:
http://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/weird-world/Is-this-really-Bigfoot.4391622.jp
Well let's see what they say about the evidence. If they've really got
a Bigfoot, all they need to do is call in a couple of anthropologists to
look at the body, and maybe get a lab somewhere to do some genetic
testing, and it's game over, right?
Strange, they're not doing either of those things:
And to back up their astonishing story, they say they intend to
present conclusive proof at a press conference
They're holding a press conference, and presenting their own "proof" to
a room full of reporters.
Of course, as hunters, they're also expert anthropologists and
biologists -- or so they apparently are reasoning -- and so they are the
obvious ones to study the find, rather than, say, someone with some
initials after his or her name who hails from a local university.
And the expert opinion of the reporters at the press conference will
confirm them in their expert conclusions as hunters.
If it's not a hoax, it sure smells like one.
Cryptozologist Loren Coleman thinks this could be real. He is usually
quite the skeptic.
Terry
