Quick - vorticians - name the country that is the world's second largest 
exporter of food and agricultural products, after
the United States.

Hint- that country is not large and warm, like Australia or Brazil, and in fact 
is *tiny* - having  only twice the acreage of the state of Massachusetts. And 
with about one-fourth of its land located below sea level, it is far from ideal 
cropland.

Hint- that country is not tropical, sunny or particuarly fertile and in fact 
has generally cold and chilly and horrible weather. It is almost synonymous 
with the use of wind energy since it has no petroleum and little coal.

Hint- that country has a population of 16 million very liberal, but 
non-communist, inhabitants

The Dutch (Netherlands) have long
been way ahead of the rest of the world in farming technology, due to 
brainpower and a general lack of other good alternatives; and having generally 
failed in their colonial ambitions they have stuck to farming for lack of 
anything better. The Dutch have a liberal but fiscally conservative government 
[the best of both worlds], allowing prostitution, euthanasia, marijuana and 
universal health care, but they have managed the world's highest
crop yields and most efficient small farms, and derive a very decent standards 
of living - which since they have little other natural wealth is quite 
remarkable. 

Although its economy is generally so far to the left as to be called socialist 
by detractors in the NeoCon movement, due to its entitlements and innate 
humanism, it is ironically also one of the most free market and capitalist farm 
economies in the world - less regulated than the US or Brit farmer - which only 
indicates that *true liberalism can be the ideal form of capitalism.*Eat you 
heart out, Remi.

It is also testament to the fact, which has been debated here on occasion, that 
land - even reclaimed and salty and marginal land - when intelligently farmed 
and fertilized, cannot be overused or depleted.

BTW - this place has more barnyard animals than people, and it would surprise 
no one if they (the animals) were not someday allowed some kind of limited 
"voice" in government some day. 

Jones

Reply via email to