To further this thought:
... most observers with EE training are critical of the Bedini two-battery (battery swapping) technique as proving gainfulness. This criticism is logical if you approach it solely from the perspective of electrical engineering, instead of EE + suprachemisty (redundant ground state reactions). OK - The reason that this MO (redundant ground state reactions happening in the battery chemistry) might have special relevance to a situation where "aether thixotropy" was a moderating influence (which limited certain kinds of rotating devices and kept them from even getting to a sustained OU state) - is that the hydrino or tight Bohr radius state would not only get around this situation; but possibly even benefit from a large viscosity increase in the aether. It should also be noted that lead-acid batteries have been said to work best for the BBS technique (AFAIK) and the reason for that is obvious in that both lead Pb+++, the oxide ion O++, and lead-oxide are all hydrino catalysts AND at the overlapping IP enthalpy of ~54.4 eV. Not to mention, this electrolyte contains lots of hydrogen. NiMH batteries work well too, and the reasoning is similar, but they are much more expensive and possibly not as active. We have mentioned oxygen as catalyst before, but with lead (Pb) the sum of first three IP states is 7.42 + 15.03 + 31.94 = ~54.4 and since oxygen is similar at ++, it would appear that the lead-acid battery (assuming that this proves correct) appears to be a little "hydrino factory" when under highly spiked and pulsed bemf. Obviously, this result is not seen in the world's 100 million automobiles which use this kind of batttery - for the simple reason that spiked pulsation has been avoided totally at the design stage -- since it is very hard on electronic parts and wiring. If the BBS techniques is ever shown to be useful it will demand much more robust wiring, for instance. Jones
