To any one who might be interested, Steve quoted me in the latest
issue of NET as follows:
For example, LENR researcher Ed Storms, retired from Los Alamos
National Laboratory, recently discouraged me from reporting all of the
key facts of LENR research. He wrote this to me in an e-mail recently:
“You need to be more careful in how you reveal the truth about the
field. Eventually, the field will be big enough and so well-accepted
that a little plainly spoken truth would not cause you any problem.”
The conclusion that Steve drew is not correct as I stated to Steve in
a recent e-mail.
Steve,
The following statement from the latest issue of NET is not correct. I
did not at any time discourage you from reporting ALL KEY FACTS about
LENR. For you to get this impression is an example of your inability
to accurately report what I say to you and is why I do not want
anything I say to you quoted by you. The context of my statement was
your report about Marianne Macy and the problems you created for
yourself in not being sensitive to the context of your reporting. At
the very least, I suggest you check with people to be sure you
understand what they are telling you rather than distort your
reporting to fit your own agenda. You can be a service, as you
intend, if you are accurate in reporting the intent of a comment. In
this case, you supplied your own interpretation of my intent, which
was not correct. I attempted to encourage you to be sensitive to how
you report facts about the subject, not to discourage you from
reporting ALL KEY FACTS. I hope you see the difference.
Ed
