Sorry Jones, You know nothing. You aren't doing research at top universities, you don't have supervisors/mentors at the highest level, have to be subject to due-diligence, show real data, approach a problem from many directions and get it to tie up, get peer reviewed.
That is the mark of real science. It's honesty, openness, plasticity of thought (the desire to move arguments on with more SOUND arguments and DATA), has a receptive ear. Mills doesn't appeal to REAL data nor appeal to the body of knowledge that has come before. Get over it. Remi. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2008 18:14 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tata, Butanol, Biofuels ----- Original Message ---- From: Remi Cornwall > Yes it a Maxwell Demon but it can be done if you know your way around the Maxwell Demon arguments. This is not to detract from you argument, which I like -- ... but would want to see more detail (like are you using the penduli in the same way as the 'tuning fork' analogy?) ... yet I find it most amusing that you can readily accept a Maxwell Demon - for which there is zero proof, and at the same time be so vocal in rejecting the Mills theory of 'redundant ground states' of hydrogen; for which there is ample proof from him, from cosmology; and even quasi-independent University replication, where a megajoule of excess is documented, and with little other way to explain it (non chemical at least). Jones
