Mitchell Swartz wrote: > Given the long history, your claim is all talk. > > As proof, I gave an open demo at MIT.
I was never able to evaluate the demo, unfortunately. I could not get close to it during the conference, and I never got a chance to read the paper about it. I had some material on it but you ordered me to erase it, which I did. > Thank you for > at least putting some pictures up at your website. I will put as much information on the website as you send me. You ordered me not to put anything else there. Let me remind you that you threatened to sue me if I uploaded any of your papers. You are the one who is preventing the distribution of your own papers -- not me. > Also, I gave you papers in hand, and CD, at Gene's > funeral when I gave you a ride back to Boston, and sent > a second copy by mail to Edmund and I have the green > card, I was unable to read the CD as I have stated countless times. If you would like me upload information, you must first upload it to your own web site, and then you must give me written permission to copy it. I will then copy it. You have to give me written permission because you have often threatened to sue me if I upload any information from you. and later Brian Josephson sent some by email to > you. So you can be more honest, Jed, if you take a moment > and check the records. In fact, by emails, you told me Edmund Storms > censored my work and there was nothing you could do about it. I have censored nothing. I will forward your latest messages to Vortex, Storms and everyone else involved in this dispute. Let me state this once more for the record, as clearly as possible: I have NEVER censored Swartz, or refused to upload his papers. HE has refused to provide them to me, or to upload them to his own web site. - Jed
