BTW - the "smoking gun" for this convoluted chain of cause and effect, 
mentioned earlier - is the 3.4 eV mass-energy transfer of pairs from the 
disrupted "quantum foam" of virtual positronium (aka the Dirac epo field) via 
FRET to induce a similar kind of "shrinkage" that Mills has found, which serve 
the purpose of reducing the Bohr orbital - but in the totally NON-Millsean way 
of "ZPE pumping."

ZPE (epo field) --> FRET --> H --> Hydrino --> virtual neutron --> transmutation

6.8 eV is the ionization potential of positronium. Half of that is the rest 
mass of the electron anti-neutrino. Twice that value is the IP of hydrogen 
(13.2 eV) also known as Ry The Rydberg constant, which can be calculated from 
more
fundamental constants using quantum mechanics; and twice Ry is the the Hartree 
energy E(subH) employed by Mills - which is equal to the absolute value of the 
electric potential energy of the hydrogen atom in its traditional ground state. 

The absorption spectrum of the phenanthrene cation has been computed to have 
its stongest resonance at 3.4 eV and its initial fluorescence can lie in photon 
radiation at 3.4 eV. That is the reason it works so well to catalyze the 
virtual neutron - as it can supply a rest mass equivalent energy (and perhaps 
QM spin as well) for the electron anti-neutrino in addition to pumping the 
hydrino ever lower and lower in radius.

And to think - this chemical is found in common creosote, coal, and asphalt. 

Hey, even that may be no accident if some early forms of life actually used 
this energy or transmutation pathway (Kervan's chicken ancestors <g>)

IOW what I am hypothesizing here, is that Mills 27.2 eV does not need to be 
supplied in a single dose resoant hole or photon as he suggests -- but instead 
can easily and more elegantly be "pumped" from the epo field using a FRET 
intermediary such as phenanthrene.

This would be a most amazing and elegant coincidence, if even partly accurate...

BTW - I would be remiss in not mentioning my 3.4 eV "connection" in this 
evolving hypothesis - none other than Fred Sparber, who convinced me of the 
importance of this value, which is found all over physics (like the smile of 
the Cheshire cat). We used it in another wild invention of his, which if memory 
serves - we called at one time the "sparberino"... which is not a bad name for 
the ZPE pump. 

The sparberino-pump - like it!

Jones

Reply via email to