Howdy Jones,
You poses some interesting doubts in the form of questions. I have had a
problems with Einstein since way back when. Perhaps my doubts are centered
on his "tenure" at Princeton as an honored laurete of science. My problem
rests with the question.. "how was Albert able to produce such a 'string of
genius publishings' in such a short period and nothing after his
recognition?" Who were Albert's associates back in Austria? Why was he
unable to further explain most of his theories? At the time Einstein was
being touted by Princeton's money managers as the most "enlightened", the
science world had been busy trashing anything Newtonian. Yet in the past ten
years, Einstein's theories have been subject to question while Newton's have
been sustained.
Along comes Mills with the greatest invention since sliced bread and has
attracted some $ 50 mil and change. This bread slicing machine is so
wonderful and full of genius that only the most brilliant thinkers can
envision it, because he can't show it to an unwashed world. Does this story"
read " made in MIT? Does this story sound like the King that wore no
clothes???
My personal opinion of Mills is he got it wrong for all the right reasons
and this has resulted in a world wide energizing of the quest for what Mills
is searching for in all the wrong places.
Why so negative in these comments ??? Perhaps it's because I have watched
Johnson Space Center Houston and NASA waste money on science fiction rather
than science. NASA leadership is now mired in losers.
Like a drunk at the Dime Box Saloon offered 5 chances to hit the floor with
his hat and missing all five,
In sports. coaching makes the difference. A championship coach produces a
string of championship teams, year after year.
The same for any team in any arena, led by a loser, loses.. in sports,in
science, in NASA, in universities, in Wall Street and in politics.
Ole Mark Twain once allowed.. things have to get a whole lot worse before
they get better.
Richard
