Jack Smith writes, WRT: So-called 'anomalous hydrogen'... who is to say this does not indicate the ubiquitous solar generated hydrino - but of the (1/n)^2 variety reduced orbital -- which is eventually diffusing to earth's core due to its effective density [and being sequestered in the compressed metal core]?
[the density far exceeding uranium or osmium, which are the two most dense elements on earth,due to the small volume} Good reference for the general principle [sans hydino] "Hydrides and Anhydrides" by C. Warren Hunt http://www.searchanddiscovery.net/documents/abstracts/2005research_calgary/abstracts/extended/hunt/hunt.htm "The new evidence involves the behavior of hydrogen nucleii, which at pressures characteristic of mantle depths have shed their electrons and inject themselves inside the first electron rings of metal atoms. Thus sequestered within the earth, hydrogen may comprise as much as 30-40 percent of total earth mass today." END of long 'pre-ramble' to the following comment and/or new hypothesis, just now dreamt-up, which contains more putative evidence for the accumulation over geologic time, of solar hydrinos of very small radius. This is a new hypothesis which you heard first on Vortex, and therefore will be repeated no where else which is frequented by mainstream science ;-) OK - other factoids to consider, which may be explicated by the existence of this putative species of hydrino (being "stored" with inner orbitals of metals) is the iron-nickel-cobalt anomaly which is seen in the most common metal meteorites (asteroids). On planet earth, iron is extremely common while the next two metals in the periodic table: cobalt and nickel are rare. The ratio of Fe:Ni:Co on the mantle of earth is 62,000:99:29 (gm/ton) ... or - when normalized to nickel being 1, there is roughly 620 times more iron, and only thirty percent cobalt. In common metal meteorites, however, we find a massively different situation. Nickel can be as high as 70% of the metal, while the iron is correspondingly reduced. Cobalt is higher than on earth but still not anomalously high. By scientifically analyzing the large class of near-pure nickel-iron asteroids, we can tell how long ago their parent body (probably a moon or small planet) was broken up. The time of collision is determined by cosmic ray nuclear dating methods. The magnitude of the collision is shown in the crystalline strain patterns. The diameters of the parent bodies is determined by the crystalline structure of the metal alloy which reveals temperature and cooling rates. Interestingly, 40% or more of the metal alloy meteorites came from only two collisions, one at approximately 650 million years ago, and the other at about 400 million years ago, as indicated by cosmic ray dating methods. This is VERY RECENT relatively speaking. ERGO - the meteorites which we find today are composed of metals which had already been "percolating in the core of an original planetoid, possibly located in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter - which had been soaking up solar hydrinos for nearly 4 billion years prior to the impact which pulverized it. That impact may have contributed to, or triggered the transmutations in metal abundance which are apparent today. That is the crux of my argument/hypothesis this fine morning. Which is an untested and new interpretation: so make your own evaluation, and/or feel free to shoot this one down in flames: as there is zero "expert" opinion possible in 2008, since so few cosmologists accept the reality of solar hydrinos. Other factoids: The numerous 650 million year old metal meteros which we find today on earth show shock induced pressures of about two million pounds per square inch. Metal meteorites have generally indicated parent bodies at least several hundred kilometers wide and could be the remnants of a planetoid at least 300 km in diameter - or both. There is no reason to believe that the composition of the original planetoid was markedly different from earth, if it formed at the same time from the previous supernova which was the progenitor of out solar system; so the most logical assumption [at least for an observer who accepts the reality of stable solar hydrinos of small radius] is widespread transmutation following a "recent" impact - in which the population of "stored" hydrinos within the inner orbitals of "what was once iron" in that planetoid - was transmuted to mostly nickel via the population of stored hydrinos in inner oribital (accumulated for billions of years, prior to impact). Remaining question: why was cobalt not favored? That is an interesting question, and there is an unexpected (to some) answer for it, which may or may not be addressed soon, on "page 2". Set your spam filters accordingly. As for this bulls-eye formative hypothesis - it is a moving target and you are a lone-gunman - so "ready, aim, fire." Jones
