Howdy Jed, Thinking of calorimetry tests brings back some thoughts of the 1950's when we were studying methods of measuring densities of powders and decided specific gravity wasn't as important as quality control. This thought resulted in simply considering comparing what we considered an ideal versus an unknown. Taking differential measurement to a higher level, measuring the difference in temperatures could be as valid as measuring absolutes. Like liquid flow measurement.. as long as one is satisfied with a acceptable rate of flow, who cares what is "exact" as long as it is "repeatable". No meter reads perfect.. but as long as an exact reading of the difference between two meters can be made.. who cares? Richard Here is part of a letter I got some time ago from Melvin Miles, about the NHE data. You can learn more about this in the Google search box at LENR-CANR.org by entering the search terms "Miles NHE."
- Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
