As a general rule: How could you (or any good citizen) NOT support full disclosure of anything which the government really "knows" IF it is not a threat to our national security.
If it is a threat, then it should not be disclosed. I would have voted for this BS "Disclosure" approach - flawed as it is - had it not been terribly slanted up front - i.e. the thing should read: 3) formally acknowledge to the American people the extraterrestrial PHYSICAL presence, IF KNOWN factually - or the highest level official assessment of the likelihood of an the extraterrestrial PHYSICAL presence if that has been made. My contention is that YES - there is a real "presence" form another civilzation, BUT I am even more convinced that there is NO extraterrestrial PHYSICAL presence, nor has there ever been - no Roswell crash, no alien autopsy, no Lazar saucer-craft stored in a warehouse somewhere. Which is not to say that mass hallucination is not only possible but probably easy to pull-off by ant intelligence from afar (and there are certainly many of them) . This kind of non-physical presence can seem very real - even to an "abductee". In this day and age, it is impossible to hide a physical relic of a real visit, if such had occurred. Why should an advanced society want to send a physical presence anyway? That is the logical error that these UFO nuts consistently make. It makes much more sense that any advanced civiliazation would vastly prefer to send a nonphysical intermediarry. Jones ----- Original Message ---- > From: Terry Blanton < > Did you notice that UFO disclosure has over 10,000?
