Hi, It occurs to me that both experimentalists and skeptics could benefit from working together. The skeptics would get a "close up and personal" look at the experiments, and the experimentalists would benefit from someone determined to find every possible reason why the experiment might be invalid, which would lead to better experiments. Of course this requires vast tolerance and patience on the part of both. ;)
The payoff is that LENR/CANR might find greater acceptance in the scientific community, and the end goal might be achieved faster. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
