----- Original Message ----- From: John Berry <[email protected]> Date: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
> Well I guess that would be off the scale, those who hold it as a > politicalideology would assume that there is a system to keep > people from harming > each other or that the society did not contain dysfunction so not > requiringany army/police/justice system to protect people > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:40 > +1300:> Hi, > > [snip] > > >I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people > must be > > >ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled > libertarian> >not anarchist which has different connotations. > (Libertarian does not > > bring > > >up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) > > > > > [snip] > > The extreme example of free will is a lawless society where > everyone is > > free to > > do exactly as they please. A state of anarchy would work only under ideal circumstances where all the participants are equally powerful from the outset. harry > This is anarchy by definition, and the > closest> example today that I can think of is Somalia. > > > > Regards, > > > > Robin van Spaandonk Anarchy is always short lived, because
