Jones Beene wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Where does that conclusion come from?
Well, I am not so naive as to believe that the wording of a funding
act will magically change ingrained opinions at the highest level, but
you should read closely the wording the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act <http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10165605-54.html>
which became law on 17 February 2009.
AKA, the Porkulus. It's intention was to grease the palms of the various
left wing special interest groups which put the present government in
power. BTW, Nancy Polisi included some provisions which enriched her
husband, well why not? Rank has it's privileges, and to the victor
belong the spoils, eh?
I suspect that Pelosi, in particular, will have an open-ear to rooting
out deliberate attempts to prevert the obvious intent of this
important legislation. Park may still have some kind of a diminishing jo
My answer is that the people who believe as we do, need to start calling
into radio shows, and other public venues, telling people to do an
Internet Search under suppression and Zero Point Energy, and see what
comes up. That and use the term poisoning the atmosphere with CO2. BTW,
Sterling Allen put me in touch with Dr. Theodore Loder, aero2012.
science adviser. We had a nice talk. I proposed the same idea to him.
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
