-----Original Message----- From: Harry Veeder
Related... Sinkholes below Lake Huron hold strange ecosystem: researchers http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/02/25/sinkholes.html Harry, This could be a different situation for the appearance of abundant but "extreme life". Cyanobacteria obtain their energy through photosynthesis and would not need another mechanism for energy, (i.e. the fractional ground state) which is so "extreme" (in exotherm) in the sense that it probably kills off most of its host for the benefit of the next generation (the offspring of the host). That kind of sacrificial parenting or cooperative regeneration - is not at all unusual in evolution, in itself. But if any hydrino mechanism were to evolve this way - it would not be very competitive with other organisms that got their energy from solar, instead of EUV photons. It encourages parasitism. Any such hydrino mechanism, it seems, would likely need to be for the benefit of the cellular life in an extreme niche, where there is nothing else to compete against. After thinking about Robin's objection to this hypotheses (wrt the large and facile natural IP gap which would be there naturally in Fe+++ (58.8 eV vs. 54.4 eV)- a revised scenario emerges. It would be a mechanisms for the polar regions which have a lot of available iron, in the form of colloids of a solid electrolyte such as magnetite (hematite). Cellular life would attach to the colloids and use any UV radiation emerging from that particle as the energy for metabolism and reproduction. It could be that the initial cell which takes in a high energy photon immediately dies, and others feed off of it. Here are more specifics- These extreme regions are at the magnetic poles, which are in total darkness for many month. Therefore, let's consider the implications resources which are still available in total darkness at the poles - still coming from of the solar coronoa ... and which according to Mills' theory is where the bulk of solar energy is actually created via hydrino shrinkage. About half the emitted energy happens through fusion in the solar core, and this explains the "solar neutrino problem." (only about half the expected neutrinos from solar fusion can be detected). The other half comes from fractional ground states, and some of the hydrinos are expelled into the solar wind. At any rate, the solar wind - which believe it or not - has never been collected for analysis outside our stratosphere - to prove or disprove this hypothesis, would contain a percentage of singly ionized "hydrino hydride" (of predominantly first stage shrinkage) as it approaches the magnetosphere of earth. This would be a shrunken hydrogen species with an extreme magnetic moment, among other features, and would be attracted to magnetite if it ever reached the surface. Since the hydrino hydride (Hy-) is charged, most of it could ONLY enter into our atmosphere, from the magnetosphere of earth - *at the polar regions*, that is: by following "field lines". Actually most of it bypasses earth - but most of it that is captured, would happen predominantly at the poles. On adsorption into colloidal hematite or magnetite, once it reaches the ice, we might expect that a percentage of the species would be both neutralized and accelerated to the necessary level to develop redundancy within the iron's naturally present ions. IOW the "energy hole" which is presented at 54.8 eV is filled by nascent hydrogen in a slingshot effect, having gained ..4 eV in effective velocity from the capture of its extra electron. That extra energy is given off with the EUV photon, so you get the higher energy emission. Yes, this is a preliminary "stab" at shoehorning a methodology - and skeptics will say that is a strained rationalization without specific evidence, and admittedly highly conjectural - but which does provide a possible mechanism for radiant energy in cold dark environments, exactly like the "Blood Falls" location in Antarctica. The advantage of having such a hypothesis in place, is that it provides specific ways to prove or disprove in a laboratory setting. I can think of several experiments already. As of now, and on contrast - the Antarctic researchers appear to have been grasping at straws (icicles) with what I perceive to be comparatively weaker, but more mainstream rationalization That is: IF (big if) the hydrino is real (i.e. conclusively proved). Mills thinks that his proof is conclusive, but others do not. As a personal matter, I believe it is absolutely true on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays but am not so sure on the other days ;-). Let's hope he gives the kibitzers a real demo sooner rather than later. Given that his IP (patent portfolio) is ageing rapidly, as we speak, he has every incentive to get a piece of the DoE's multi-billion buck "stimulus" package. It is a golden opportunity, with a window which will not last long. Already a single solar plant near here has gotten hundreds of millions and BLP would get much more, IF it were to go public with a robust demo. This window of opportunity has not gone unnoticed in Cranberry. Jones
