This is the first time I recall an environmentally oriented page saying
something positive. See:

http://www.green-energy-news.com/arch/nrgs2009/20090037.html

They have the notion that the Feds intend to support cold fusion. I have not
heard anything about this.

QUOTES:

. . . Typically, Washington is not about making major changes and major
disruptions yet there is a very faint ray of hope that considering energy
and climate, something drastic has to happen and Washington is willing to do
it. Evidence of that showed up in a funding opportunities notice released as
part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) (better
known as the Stimulus Package). The following is the official summary of
this particular funding opportunity:

“ The U.S. Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy
(ARPA-E) (a new DOE Agency created specifically to foster R&D of
transformational energy related technologies) requests proposals for
Advanced Research Projects. Transformational technologies are defined as
those that disrupt the status quo; not merely better than current
technologies, but significantly better. This RFP supports the Nation’s need
to overcome the threats posed by climate change and energy security, arising
from its reliance on traditional uses of fossil fuels and the dominant use
of oil in transportation. Concept papers are required, and are due 6/2/09.
Final proposals accepted by invitation only.”

With this notice, and the creation of ARPA-E itself, the Obama
Administration is sending a new message: Yes, we are willing to replace oil
and coal with something else. Yes, we are willing to look into drastic
changes.

The award ceiling is $20 million. Cost sharing or matching funding is
required and eligible applicants are unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of
entity), but it appears as though you or your company must be a registered
Federal Government Vendor. (If you’re interested in this opportunity, check
with DOE for particulars on this requirement. I may be wrong.)

One of the technologies that seems a likely candidate for this funding is
the rebirth of cold fusion, or now known as a low energy nuclear reaction
(LENR) such as featured in a 60 Minutes TV news magazine segment on April
19. A LENR device that supplied heat or power (or both) using a
radiation-free nuclear reaction to power our homes and our cars would
certain fit the definition of “transformational technology”. (Defined as one
that disrupts the status quo.)

In the television report three laboratories were profiled: Energetics
Technologies, a New Jersey based company with research facilities in Omer,
Israel; SRI International of Menlo Park, California; and ENEA, the Italian
National Agency for New Technologies.

There’s more to the story than was broadcast that evening.

What the report didn’t make clear was that Energetics Technologies pioneered
the LENR process profiled on the program, which was then successfully
replicated by both SRI and ENEA.  Further, 60 Minutes didn’t point out that
the now famous Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) memorandum
which, according to the broadcast,

concludes that there is ‘no doubt that anomalous excess heat is produced in
these experiments.” The memorandum specifically referred to the results of
the DARPA-funded SRI replication, and to the ENEA replication of the
research pioneered by Energetics Technologies.

We’ll be hearing more from Energetics Technologies. That’s for certain. . .
.

END QUOTE

- Jed

Reply via email to