Okay, I figured out the notation in this Mengoli paper, that I accidentally discussed here this morning. Title:

Mengoli, G., et al., Calorimetry close to the boiling temperature of the D2O/Pd electrolytic system. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998. 444: p. 155.

The notation must be European I suppose. They use slash when they should use parenthesis, by American standards. So, for example, Table 4, column 1 heading is:

I / mA

which I would write: I (mA) meaning "current measured in milliamperes." When they mean "per" as in "milliamperes per square centimeter" they write "mA cm-2" where I would write mA/cm-2"

Okay, putting aside the confusion, I really should have been paying more attention to this paper. I shall ask Mike to ask Mengoli to ask the publisher for permission to upload it. Last time it was denied. If I cannot get permission I should describe it in a review because it is spectacular. Here are some details.

"Abstract

The electrolytic insertion of deuterium into Pd at 95°C was investigated by a simple calorimetric technique. This involved continuous feeding of heating power to the electrolytic cell to maintain it isothermal with an external thermostatic bath: any extraneous thermal phenomenon taking place inside the cell is directly determined by the lack of balance of the original heating power input. It was thus found that Pd loading by deuterium is always paralleled by excess power generation, which largely exceeds the electrolytic power input. After prolonged electrolysis the loaded electrodes were found to continue heat generation in open circuit (o.c.) conditions. The reproducibility of the thermal phenomenon allowed its dependence on several experimental parameters to be investigated."


"Discussion

The major achievement of this work is to have devised a temperature range in which the generation of excess power is a totally reproducible phenomenon. In fact, only a reproducible phenomenon can be investigated successfully, due to its dependence on the experimental variables. Here, the dependence of electrolysis time, current density, cathode shape, o.c. conditions, and presence of hydrogen in the electrolyte highlighted some correlations which, although they do not explain the excess power generation, may help to rationalize the phenomenon. Attention will be focused on these correlations."


Important results:

Table 3, describing run 3:

Run duration 21 days total

Steady current density of 23 mA/cm-2 on days 1, 2, 6, 7 and 10 to 13 (8 days total)

No power (o.c.) on the other 13 days

Total input energy was 0.42 MJ, output 1.8 +/- 0.16 MJ, 4.3 times bigger. From day 14 – 21 (8 days) input is zero and output is 0.844 MJ; i.e. heat after death.

- Jed

Reply via email to