i am in agreement partially. since it included substance, it was simply an insult, as it was not the basis of his arguement.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Rick Monteverde <r...@highsurf.com> wrote: > The message, despite the link, was clearly ad-hominem. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:sa...@pobox.com] >> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:13 AM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Greenhouse Effect...Time for >> some balance? > >> >> The page in question was actually directed at his message, >> not the messenger, despite the title. There was no ad >> hominem involved at all. >> >> Anyone unclear on this should go read the page to which Nick >> posted the link, which directly addresses Miskolczi's >> arguments regarding global warming. Nothing at all that I >> saw on that page attacked Mizkolczi, the man. >> >> > > >
