Alexander Hollins wrote:
Lets NOT actually discuss the political posts that caused the whole
furor on this list, mmmkay? That's just throwing gasoline back on
the fire that our good moderator is TRYING to put out. You want to
discuss grok and his posting habits and politics directly, send it to
B where it belongs PLEASE.
Oh contrare. My posts dwelt with the sciences of epistemology; the study
of knowledge and praxeology; the study of the root causes of human
behavior. We just witnessed an example of the sort of rude and obnoxious
behavior which post modernity has produced in a segment of the
population who have embraced it's various philosophical elements.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:53 AM, thomas malloy<[email protected]> wrote:
OrionWorks wrote:
I recall two recent comments of worth:
Harry Veeder wrote:
If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious
commentary as well?
And from Stephen Lawrance:
The specific problem was caused by incontinent spraying of
political issues over every topic which was introduced.
Good advice from Stephen. I should probably do that more often than I
actually do.
My own two cents:
From what I could see the "grok" persona was using the guise of
wanting to engage in discussions of political ideology primarily as a
preferred weapon of choice in which to slay his perceived enemies.
Grok also butchered the English language, and refused to correct his
Marxism is a religion and dialectal materialism is it's theology. It says
I stopped reading his posts last month, and only read what he said when he
was quoted by other Vortexians.
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
