Hey, good to see you around, last I recall you had some tesla binary electromagnet thingy which I didn't understand. (my description of which may be so poor as to confuse you)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Harvey Norris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Michael Crosiar <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Relativistic magnetic fields and time > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 2:49 AM > > >Ok, well > > if it's axial field orientation then I would say you > > have walked right into the N-Machine paradox. > > > > >Which is, does the magnetic field actually rotate when > > you rotate a magnet on an axial orientation? > Only during changes in time of the angular momentum. > > > > > > For me I see no paradox. And yes, I have thought of the > > N-Machine a lot in this regard. > > > > >It is very difficult to prove since the only effect > > from an axially rotating magnet is a generally very weak > > electric field gradient. > The effect is much greater if the rotating part is instead the unmagnetised > material contained as the reluctance pathways in the design of the disc > shaped pole face rotor ELECTROMAGNETIC of the alternator design. In that > case a CONSTANT angular momentum pivots the spins of the random > ferromagnetic domains to produce moving magnetism external to its own > movement. > HDN > >
