Edmund Storms wrote:
Michel, I understand that power measurements are not made while the
superwave is on.
I think the superwave electrolysis is turned on most of the time, but
not all of the time. They do report "heat after death" that is,
output for hours or days at a time in the absence of input. See, for
example, Figs. 6, 8 and 9 here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIultrasonic.pdf
This is a little complicated, because this paper is about ultrasonic
excitation, which is not the same as SuperWave excitation. I am
assuming the input electrolysis power is delivered in SuperWave
format, not the ultrasonic waves. That's my take from p. 8 here as well:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIprogressin.pdf
That looks like SuperWave electrolysis with the longest cycle 1.4
hours. Anyway, the input sure fluctuates. That's not regular input.
Neither is the input shown in Ref. 1.
Figure 6 shows the ultrasound turning on and off for the first 15
days. As far as I can see, electrolysis continues during these
periods, and it is always SuperWave electrolysis. Around day 30 there
are arrows pointing to segments that say "Pin turned off" and "Heat
after death" meaning, I suppose, that SuperWave electrolysis input
power is off during these segments.
Fig. 8 shows heat after death in close up. Unfortunately the units
are hard to read. I think it continues for 50,000 seconds (14 hours).
Their conclusion:
"The reproducibility of excess heat generation is quite high; it is
higher than the reproducibility obtained in our previous electrolysis
experiments that did not incorporate ultrasonic cavitation."
In their earlier experiments with glow discharge with SuperWave input
power they also report heat after death. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIintensific.pdf
I wonder what would happen with a grand-slam stimulation package
combining SuperWave electrolysis, ultrasonic, lasers, high
temperature and (why not?) magnets. Sensory overload and shutdown? A
mini nuke explosion like the ones reported periodically?
Ed also wrote:
Production of over 30 watts while applying less than 1 watt is so
unambiguous that the ability to produce excess power is clearly proven.
Absolutely. It is ridiculous to quibble.
- Jed
