I sent two previous copies of this message but it did not appear to
go through. Apologies if this is a duplicate (triplicate).
. . . . . . .
Okay, I have now communicated with Tanya Zilov and Mike McKubre, and
we have worked out what's what with this and other calorimeters.
Let me explain.
First, Kirk Shanahan correctly pointed out that the figures seemed to
show an Isoperibolic calorimeter. It looked as if the "Cooling water
inlet" and outlet was only being used to keep the cooling jacket at a
uniform temperature.
However, that was not the case. Zilov explained that they do perform
flow calorimetry with this cell, as the text says. They measure inlet
and outlet temperatures and the flow rate. The cooling water tube
comes in, goes around a coil and then goes out. So I revised Fig. 1
to make this clearer, and I uploaded a new version:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIultrasonic.pdf
My confusion was compounded by the fact that McKubre replicated an
earlier experiment that did use Isoperibolic calorimetry, in both his
replication and Energetics Tech. original. This experiment did not
incorporate ultrasound stimulation.
Another question came up with regard to where they use SuperWaves. At
this stage, only the electrolysis power is modulated with the
SuperWave pattern, not the ultrasound. They are working on a new
ultrasound generator that will produce ultrasound in SuperWaves.
- Jed
