Steve Krivit put up a provocative and insightful video on YouTube that has
gone almost unnoticed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bujrxqwRwc0&feature=channel_page

It centers on the Frascatti results, and the internal political workings and
machinations, related to LENR in Italy.

A similar situation was probably going on here in the USA, behind the
scenes.


The take-way message for me was the brief blip at the end - where the
producer of the piece is trying desperately to make sense of the whole
thing. 

He come to the almost the identical conclusions that many of us have come
to, over the years. My first post on it was 15 years ago.

It all goes back to the politics of uranium, and particularly depleted U as
a disruptive fuel source which would render as worthless a large
infrastructure related to enriching U (with the military implications); then
there is the related issue of proliferation; and finally there is the
transfer of "expertise" from one entrenched group and the loss of prestige
(and of high paying  jobs) for the keepers of the faith in hot fusion and
enrichment, to a the group of raggedy outsiders. We as a nation do not want
individual (or low lever) control over energy resources. 

That entrenched group of about a quarter million mostly PhDs and top-notch
brain power has failed us miserably the past five decades, and wasted
billions of R&D dollars on dead-end programs that almost any grad student
today can see has zero chance of financial viability. I get sick to my
stomach watching the Major Network and Smiling Politician back-slapping
adulation over such incredible boondoggles as the National Ignition Facility
at Lawrence Livermore National Lab. It is almost criminal in the sense that
it CANNOT ever be financially viable.

Thinking small. This is almost anti-American. If we cannot Super-Size it,
then it can't be good for Joe the Plumber.

The final minute of this video is most thought provoking. It brings back
flashes of the Spanish Inquisition, and other instances where an
overwhelming but misguided majority opinion can easily quash the minority
(and correct) opinion. Fortunately the torture devices are no longer
physical. OTOH perhaps burning at the stake is preferable in some ways. At
least its all over quickly.

Jones

Reply via email to