of course, earlier it was 12:34:56 7/8/09
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Jones Beene<[email protected]> wrote:
> It’s all relative, sez one. And no telling how much twittering bandwidth was
> lost on this bit (actually several bytes):
>
> .... in less than two hours PDT (at six seconds after 4:05 pm to be precise)
>
> … it will be one of the most sequential occasions in recent memory. If you
> catch my drift.
>
>
>
> 04:05:06 07/08/09
>
> This will not happen again for one thousand years (if we make it past 2012,
> of course)
>
> Of course, next year there will be 05:06:07 08/09/10 etc etc etc
>
> Don’t miss it…