On Jul 12, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I don't know why he didn't run.
He didn't ran because he was a scapegoat. Scapegoats don't run, by
their
very definition.
It's always better to blame it all on a "lone shooter", than
acknowledge
the corruption within the system.
This is wildly OFF TOPIC, it's provocative politics of the worst
sort,
it appears in this message unsupported by anything except your bald
assertion. The discussion in this thread had to do with Madoff as a
model for scammers in other areas, which is certainly relevant to the
'free energy' field.
However, Mauro's dialectical twist on it is something else. We have
heard all this junk about the "corruption within the system" being
the
root of all evil, very recently, from Grok. We have no need to
hear it
all over again from Mauro.
PLEASE KEEP THIS GARBAGE OFF VORTEX.
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm not trolling, or trying to initiate a
debate. I just felt the question was hanging in the hair, so to speak.
I came up with the "scapegoat" thesis on my own, so I'll not post any
links (besides, this is OT). An internet search should yield some
interesting results on the subject, I suppose.
Mauro, this is not a subject that benefits from debate because it is
so much a matter of opinion without factual support. In addition, you
are using the word scapegoat incorrectly. The scapegoat is an
innocent person who is used by the guilty to misdirect blame. In this
case Malloff is clearly guilty along with many other people. These
other people are gradually being found and will also be sent to
prison. This scam affected too many important people to be ignored.
In any case, this subject has no general importance except to make a
person more careful where they put their money and whom they trust.
Ed
Regards,
Mauro
