Horace Heffner wrote:
There have also been stunning "heat after death" radiographs of Ti
cathodes taken at BARQ India. The surfaces were active for
months. Search on "radiograph" on LENR- CANR.org.
Note however, that's lukewarm fusion. Not exactly cold. Way more
reactions than predicted by plasma fusion theory, but basically
plasma fusion. The same can be said for Claytor and the glow
discharge work. I suppose it is cold fusion insofar as it seems to
require a metal lattice.
The relevant papers by Rout and Iyengar are listed with the
autoradiograph images here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Experiments.htm#AutoradiographsMSrinivasan
Also, it isn't heat after death, it is radioactivity, which I gather
many high energy physicists find more convincing than heat. The late
Douglas Morrison was so convinced, he freaked out, refused to look,
and never mentioned the results. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GeorgeRthecoldfus.pdf
John Huizenga had a similar reaction when Russ George and I showed
him the Lautzenhiser results when they first came out, at ICCF-4. In
old-fashioned lingo you might say he blanched, swallowed his gum, and
ran. For an old guy he took off with remarkable speed. As far as I
can tell he never mentioned the subject to anyone. See:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
There are quite a number of results in the literature that prominent
skeptics are aware of but refuse to acknowledge. A recent example is
the SRI results that Richard Garwin endorsed in his report to the
Pentagon and then lied about on CBS "60 Minutes." See:
http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm#CBS60minutes
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/reports/GarwinLewisReport/garwin.shtml
- Jed
