I just checked Wikipedia for the first time in months. Their latest shenanigan is to delete Dieter Britz's site. They made up some strange sounding reason. It is kind of funny because Britz is on their side. He is a "skeptic" who does not believe cold fusion is real.
Since we cannot do anything to improve the article I hope these people keep making it worse and worse, so that it will apparent to unbiased readers that the article is wrong. I do not worry about the people who read it and believe it. They are a lost cause. If they miss seeing Wikipedia they will be taken in by Scientific American, the DoE or some other organization that opposes cold fusion. There is any amount of anti-cold fusion material from mainstream sources. It has no depth. There are no studies or carefully laid out arguments or refutations. They never challenge the experimental evidence because they have never heard of it. The attacks are always the same and can be summarized in a few paragraphs: i.e., the cold fusion theory was wrong (always a "theory"!); it was never replicated; Pons and Fleischmann were disgraced; pathological science; bla, bla, bla. It is more like an incantation than an argument. McKubre and others have remarked that they could present a more convincing skeptical argument than the skeptics themselves do. - Jed
