what do you think of the large hard-on collider? Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: Harbach Jak <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009 1:01 pm Subject: [Vo]:IreMyth"TimeDialation"
> > > > > > ?Did not Einstein indicate the reality of the manipulation of time > vs relative speed? > > > > > > ? ? ?So why is this so hard to believe is quite possible, even > probable; by say even a 'future version of ourselves' not to > mention maybe those who 'terra-formed us' & who preceed us > evolutionarily by maybe several millions(maybe evern billions) of > years? Some psuedo-thinkers are so 'narrow' that they could see > through a key-whole with both eyes at the same time. . . .~:-O > > > > > > > > * * *Hola Amigos; > > > > > Sweet falacy & the Humanities: > > > This morning's caffeine & sugar rush is Great! > > > > ? ? ?And why do most yuppies need their children to act like small- > zombies rather than the EXUBERANT INFORMATION SPONGES that is their > really cool genetic heritage as the top-o-the-food-chain species on > the planet~(at present)~anyway? > > > The Humanities are a lovely subject to contemplate as is Hard > Archeology & Anthropology. > > When we do find 'temporally displaced' objects impossibly > placed/out of place in 'time' we tend to just BLOW IT OFF. > > Enter the likes of master debunker J.Allen Hynek who no rational > scientific mind would be likely to spurn in regards to scientific > process nor integrity. > > Hynek's ultimate stance is history and 'hard-evidence' is so > tedious, bland, and easily shoved off onto some back shelf, so > screw it if it cramps our dulcet humanites theories. We wouldn't > want to upset the applecart regarding some tenured Prof.'s tried & > true,(and boring/by-wrote) lectures. So much for intellectual > curiosity which 'should' be the hallmark of EVERY FIELD OF > SCIENTIFIC ENDEAVOR and not just OU. > > How should history regard 'flying shields' that breach the > impregnable walls of the ancient island city of Tyre with 'beams of > light; when otherwise the Macedonian's siege would have likely > failed? Well, thats just 'myth;' right; but it is duely recorded > 'myth' all the same. And pretty much 'every other aspect' of the > Alexandrian chronicles are considered 'hard-historic-data.' Those > pesky 'flying disks' are always popping up like piss-ants at your > picnic anyway. > > And oddly some centuries before that a deluded religious oddball by > the name of Jonah was swallowed/dead & survived/back-from-the- > likely-dead having been in the belly of a USO-oh crap-I mean a > sperm whale in the Mediterranean Sea with bad stomach gas. And > when he got mugged by the Japanese turtle, well that was just the > frosting on the cake------------oh yea! > > Aside: I've found that Japanese tourists with those nice-state-of- > the-art cameras are just as onerous as the turtles anyday. > > But after the fish old Jonah just happened to predict the future > 'Total destruction of Tyre;' the fish told him, right? And this all > seemed just a bit of a stretch at the time. And tenacious as the > future Alexander indeed was, his low tech approach would have > required a bit more luck than chance was likely to avail any plucky > conqueror. Without massive now-modern artillary and hi-tech air > superiority, a modern tank-division or two would have been hard > pressed to breach those ancient massive multi-staged walls of Tyre. > The Nazi siege of Stalingrad in the Russian winter had far better > odds of success than Alexander's Tyre adventure. > > ?And what in the bloody hell did Ancient Ysraeli Pre-Helenic myth > have to do with Macedonian-Greek Platonically educated WarLords and > their belief system---->? ?We're to swallow that Alexander was > conscioulsy keyed into a belief in 'ancient Jewish USO-Fish > predicting FlyingShield air superiority back-up; and this centuries > down the line for a King & Kingdom that didn't even exist at the > time of said prediction? > > > > Oh yea, right, but Alexander went to India and heard of the good > old ancient 'Vimana' wars etc.; but oops oh crap, Al's India thing > was 'after' Tyre. Oh hell; we've always got Swamp-Gasss; or maybe > just over-educated into oblivious-credentialitis-pedantis > chondriasis, gas. > > A la' Carl Jung; whatever injects 'data' into the collective > consciousness at any juncture in history is, as usual, likely to > end up as flying turtles or what-have-you. But does this > necessarily 'debunk' the 'exotic/but maybe exotically real' > causitive agent for starting the 'myth' in the first place? Can > legends ever be said to have been rooted in (not necessarily > prozaic) fact? And is it truely professionally & intellectually > sound to out-of-hand to subject the 'exotic' to the poo-pooing of > our erst-while social scientists? > > And as for much of what is passed off as Social 'science;' it is > NOT HARD SCIENCE but rather spongey & soft science at best. And > who of those paying scrupulous attention to the pithy ramblings of > our credentialesque-debunkers, have not noticed this?-: I'VE NEVER > MET TWO SOCIAL SCIENTIST-PRACTITIONERS who AGREE on ANY PRACTICAL > POINT unless they've been contracted for lucre to DEBUNK SOMETHING > unpopular-or embarrassing etc.. So what indeed are they 'expert' > at other than their own 'extremely humanly-quirky' MODUS of > INTERPRETATION? And this includes ulterior motives of $, Tenure, > intellectual-hubris, intellectual cowardice, and sundry other > ulteriors of themselves &/or their various employers-often > goverment employed &/or funded. > > HARD EVIDENCE: Pilot's testimonies(often military), exotic > accompanying physical anomolies, hard-radar-targets, etc. 'ad > infinitum' do yet fall within the range of empirical credibility. > And NO CONVENTIONAL THEORY has even the SLIGHTEST HOPE of > explaining the PROVEN(not myth) phenomenon of "Spooky Action @ > (impossibly vast)Distance" for instance and this IS hard evidence > as well. > > So much for the silliness of 'conventional/established' LAWFUL theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:41:13 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:More Abductions > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Let me just add one more example that it is not contentious or > politically loaded. Many Americans nowadays believe that sugar is a > stimulant. For example, they believe that if their children eat > sugared cereal for breakfast they will get a "sugar high" and race > around the house causing commotion. I know some well-educated > parents who are convinced they observed this firsthand. > > ("Ignoring a common cause" logical fallacy.) > > I believe this notion arose recently. In a few generations it will > be forgotten. > > - Jed > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. > http://www.windowslive.com/Desktop/PhotoGallery
