~HAPPY 'Google Honors the Unexplained'-DAY!~




 

GOOD STUFF: from Frank Roarty: "NATURE would frame the interaction to avoid 
paradox"
 


From: [email protected]










[SNIP] ? ?So why is this so hard to believe is quite possible, even probable; 
by say even a 'future version of ourselves'
[Reply] good point and interfacing with our future selves would explain much 
the lack of physical evidence because nature would frame the interaction to 
avoid paradox or create an alternate universe of which we would be unaware. 
Maybe when the UFO or future selves finally do make themselves known it will 
mean we are just an alternate universe :_)
 

*********************************************************

~NATURE, Author of trans-temporal & trans-dimensional 'bridging.'~

 

 

~JH~This is 'HUGE:'  We assume that 'cross-temporal' interactions to be 
'un-natural.'  But here Fran's premise that within 'Nature' there is mechanism 
to 'balance/sythesize' cross temporal 'bridging.'   Quite possibly this is 
fundamentally intrinsic within this greater conceptual framework of 
multi-dimensional 'Nature.'  And within this multi-universe/multi-dimensional 
reality, Nature itself virtually-dictates that cross-dimensionl/transtemporal 
bridging is even a prozaic natural function.
 
And therefore that we have inherited a natural anti-paradox buffering mechanism 
within our own perceptual/conceptual internal cerebral matrix may be part & 
parcel to the likely possibility that we perhaps share some DNA with 
cousin-beings. And they indeed have(and we have in parallel) been moving 
transdimensionally/transtemporally for a very long relative 'time.'  And this 
is & was always their & our inexorable/destined path for our evolutionary 
journey.  And thusly &/or inevitably this is the Natural 
transdimensional/transtemporal direction of ALL SENTIENT evolving life.
 
The 'ALL' probably more resembles a 
Cross-Universe/transdimensional/transtemporal Kaliedoscopic Matrix.  What do we 
call it?  Will 'Omni-Verse' do?
 
And do we have an internal mechanism for 'navigating' the Omnikaliedoverse that 
is imminently rising to functionality within our species on the near horizon?
 
And is the supposed 'soon-to-arrive' old time-linear perceptive 'end' as the 
TIME IS NO MORE point to broach our reality imminently (a la' 2012 yadda yadda) 
so actually our species will in 'one gestalt-collective' jump awaken with the 
ability to PERCEIVE & NAVIGATE cross-temporally/transdimensionally?  Hell yea, 
I'm READY!  And thusly we will have surmounted/evolved beyond the ability to 
even imaginatively-create-perceive a paradox in a single final evolutionary 
step(up to that point anyway).
 
And mostly it will be because we will have attained the internal perceptual 
mechanism to 'see the kaliedoscopically gyrating order as a living-functional 
gestalt-whole'  which will cancel even the 'notion' of paradox in our organic 
acuity and thus make extinct even the  term & concept for such as 'paradox' in 
our human vocabulary.
 
 
Fran nailed it out of the ball-park methinks;  I wish I was nearly as 'deft' 
and less verbose. Ha!  But being part of Human Gestalt-Collective means we all 
get to share in the harvest; especially if we 'loosen-up a bit;' which is 
very-VERY COOL!------- Regards~JH~
 



 
 




From: Harbach Jak [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 1:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:IreMyth"TimeDialation"
 


?Did not Einstein indicate the reality of the manipulation of time vs relative 
speed?  
 
 
? ? ?So why is this so hard to believe is quite possible, even probable; by 
say, even a 'future version of ourselves' not to mention maybe those who 
'terra-formed us' &  who preceed us evolutionarily by maybe several 
millions(maybe evern billions) of years?  Some psuedo-thinkers are so 'narrow' 
that they could see through a key-whole with both eyes at the same time. . . 
.~:-O



* * *Hola Amigos;


Sweet falacy & the Humanities:
 

This morning's caffeine & sugar rush is Great!  
 
? ? ?And why do most yuppies need their children to act like small-zombies 
rather than the EXUBERANT INFORMATION SPONGES that is their really cool genetic 
heritage as the top-o-the-food-chain species on the planet~(at present)~anyway?
 

The Humanities are a lovely subject to contemplate as is Hard Archeology & 
Anthropology.
 
When we do find 'temporally displaced' objects impossibly placed/out of place 
in 'time' we tend to just BLOW IT OFF.  
 
Enter the likes of master debunker J.Allen Hynek who no rational scientific 
mind would be likely to spurn in regards to scientific process nor integrity.
 
Hynek's ultimate stance is history and 'hard-evidence' is so tedious, bland, 
and easily shoved off onto some back shelf, so screw it if it cramps our dulcet 
humanites theories.  We wouldn't want to upset the applecart regarding some 
tenured Prof.'s tried & true,(and boring/by-rote) lectures.  So much for 
intellectual curiosity which 'should' be the hallmark of EVERY FIELD OF 
SCIENTIFIC ENDEAVOR and not just OU.
 
How should history regard 'flying shields' that breach the impregnable walls of 
the ancient island city of Tyre with 'beams of light; when otherwise the 
Macedonian's siege would have likely failed?  Well, thats just 'myth;' right; 
but it is duely recorded 'myth' all the same.  And pretty much 'every other 
aspect' of the Alexandrian chronicles are considered 'hard-historic-data.'  
Those pesky 'flying disks' are always popping up like piss-ants at your picnic 
anyway.
 
And oddly some centuries before that a deluded religious oddball by the name of 
Jonah was swallowed/dead & survived/back-from-the-likely-dead, having been in 
the belly of a USO-oh crap-I mean a sperm whale in the Mediterranean Sea with 
bad stomach gas.   And when he got mugged by the Japanese turtle, well that was 
just the frosting on the cake------------oh yea!
 
Aside:  I've found that Japanese tourists with those nice-state-of-the-art 
cameras are just as onerous as the turtles anyday.
 
But after the fish 'bit' old Jonah just happened to predict the future 'Total 
destruction of Tyre;' the fish told him, right? And this all seemed just a bit 
of a stretch at the time.  And tenacious as the future Alexander indeed was, 
his low tech approach would have required a bit more luck than chance was 
likely to avail any plucky conqueror.  Without massive now-modern artillary and 
hi-tech air superiority, a modern tank-division or two would have been hard 
pressed to breach those ancient massive multi-staged walls of ancient Tyre. The 
Nazi siege of Stalingrad in the Russian winter had far better odds of success 
than Alexander's Tyre adventure.
 
?And what in the bloody hell did Ancient Ysraeli Pre-Helenic myth have to do 
with Macedonian-Greek Platonically educated WarLords and their belief 
system---->?  ?We're to swallow that Alexander was conscioulsy keyed into a 
belief in 'ancient Jewish USO-Fish predicting FlyingShield air superiority 
back-up for a campaign that even Al-himself had not yet thought up?  And this 
all was centuries down the line for a King & Kingdom that didn't even exist at 
the time of said prediction?  
 
Oh yea,  right, but Alexander went to India and heard of the good old ancient 
'Vimana' wars etc.; but oops oh crap, Al's India thing was 'after' Tyre.  Oh 
hell;  we've always got Swamp-Gasss; or maybe just over-educated into 
oblivious-credentialitis-pedantis chondriasis, gas.
 
A la' Carl Jung; whatever injects 'data' into the collective consciousness at 
any juncture in history is, as usual, likely to end up as flying turtles or 
what-have-you.  ?But does this necessarily 'debunk' the 'exotic/but maybe 
exotically real' causitive agent for starting the 'myth' in the first place?  
Can legends ever be said to have been rooted in (not necessarily prozaic) fact? 
 And is it truely professionally & intellectually sound to out-of-hand to 
subject the 'exotic' to the poo-pooing of our erst-while social scientists 
without challenge?   
 
And as for much of what is passed off as Social 'science;' it is NOT HARD 
SCIENCE but rather spongey & soft science at best.  And who of those paying 
scrupulous attention to the pithy ramblings of our credentialesque-debunkers, 
have not noticed this?-:  I'VE NEVER MET TWO SOCIAL SCIENTIST-PRACTITIONERS who 
AGREE on ANY PRACTICAL POINT unless they've been contracted for lucre to DEBUNK 
SOMETHING unpopular-or embarrassing etc..  ?So what indeed are they 'expert' at 
other than their own 'extremely humanly-quirky' MODUS of INTERPRETATION?  And 
this includes ulterior motives of $, Tenure, intellectual-hubris, intellectual 
cowardice, and sundry other ulteriors of themselves &/or their various 
employers-often goverment employed &/or funded.
 
HARD EVIDENCE: Pilot's testimonies(often military),  exotic accompanying 
physical anomolies, hard-radar-targets,  etc. 'ad infinitum' do yet fall within 
the range of empirical credibility.   And NO CONVENTIONAL THEORY has even the 
SLIGHTEST HOPE of explaining the PROVEN(not myth) phenomenon of "Spooky Action 
@ (impossibly vast)Distance" for instance and this IS hard evidence as well.
 
So much for the silliness of 'conventional/established' LAWFUL theory.
 
IRISH MYTH & FOLKLORE:  There was a prince(likely a local warlord's kid) who 
happened to be well known to his neighbors and also own a very cool white 
stallion to ride. And prince & horse  had a minor abduction 'thing' occur to 
them one fine day.  An exotic quasi-human female lured the princeling(white 
stud & all) into a shimmering silver eliptoid floating 'thing/vessel.'  Horney 
princes are an easy catch.  And the guy down in South America had it easy 
because he got to come right back and got a 'new set of his own newly grown 
teeth' in the bargain to go with his toss in the hay with the wierd-but-horney 
hyper-red head.
 
The Irish Prince floated away into a mist not to be seen again for a couple of 
centuries when he was deposited back in his place but obviously not in his 
'time.'  Yea I know that Irish Princes speaking outdated forms of their 
languange riding White-Stallions & sporting anciently crafted garb, weapons, 
and horse-tack are a dime-a-dozen in big old Ireland. And like Bram Bones these 
guys spoof the locals all the time.  Everyone knows that the Irish are B.larney 
S. Artists extraordinaire, and don't kiss the Blarney stone either if ya' don't 
want the dew of last nights after-closing 'pint's' drainage upon your lips.  
Tourists are nearly as gullible as UFOniks!~;-)
 
AFTER NOTE:  Budd Hopkin, I believe recorded, some (yea I know) odd post 
abduction hypnotically regressed (yadda yadda) undecipherable language from I 
believe Betty Andreasson of "Andreasson Affair" notoriety.
 
Purportedly the 'unknown jibberish/star language' was transcribed phoenetically 
and later 'translated' as an ancient form of GAELIC by a credible/credentialed 
linguistic scholar.  ?Genetic Memory?Swamp Gas? More myth, poppycock, & B.S. 
hysteria?
 
By the way;  that Andreasson 'Gaelic/StarLanguage message' would make the hair 
stand up on end with goose-flesh in the bargain.  But every social-scientist of 
any standing well-knows that we homo-sapiens-sapiens have a specific 'node' 
within our cerebrum for housing Myth-B.S. and other forms of fireside 
entertainment . . . Enjoy!~:-)~JH~













Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:41:13 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More Abductions
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Let me just add one more example that it is not contentious or politically 
loaded. Many Americans nowadays believe that sugar is a stimulant. For example, 
they believe that if their children eat sugared cereal for breakfast they will 
get a "sugar high" and race around the house causing commotion. I know some 
well-educated parents who are convinced they observed this firsthand.

("Ignoring a common cause" logical fallacy.)

I believe this notion arose recently. In a few generations it will be forgotten.

- Jed




_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on 
Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009

Reply via email to