>From Horace > I think the most likely explanation is that the beam splitter sags multiple wavelengths > when the device is at the critical angle shown, i.e. when the beam splitter is horizontal. > This explains maximum interference at the 180 degree opposed points, and no interference > when the device is on the level. Tidal effects on g might even be seen, given the extreme > sensitivity of the device.
I'm puzzled that more observers haven't asked this very question. It's the first thing that popped in my head when I viewed this video... but what do I know! ;-) > A much more rigid set of optical components and mounts are required. Also, as ever, > replication, replication, replication .... A suggestion. Place the apparatus on a zero-g jet (the Vomit Comet) and conduct the experiment in free-fall. Make sure it goes through all the angles - a full 360 degree sweep. I'll just bet that Horace's suggested "sagging" effect will become even more pronounced at the appropriate positions when the jet is climbing (to gain altitude - +2Gs), and then mysteriously disappears completely when it's in free fall - zero g. Another suggestion might be to simply place your hand against the beam splitter components (if such components are accessible to manual touch) and apply a gentle amount of "manual" force, as if one was attempting to simulate the effects of gravity. My bet is that the interference waves will move based on manual intervention. > That was a great video, a great narrative, and a cool experiment. It could turn out to > be groundbreaking, ... or not. Yes, it is a well done video, I'll grant that! And who knows, maybe there is something here... but I remain highly suspicious. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
