Jack O Suileabhain wrote:
> .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size:
> 10pt; font-family:Verdana } The device looks flimsy: Centrifugal
> momentum at the bottom of the gravity trough 'pendulum' swing is
> going to amplify enough 'g's to simply torque the componants of the
> apparatus. To negate this the apparatus would have to be concrete
> imbedded bolt-anchored to the floor & the entire structure would
> needs be entirely tooled of much tougher stuff. German tool steel
> would do it for the framework and extremely good bearings to avoid
> stress vibration at the high centrifugal amplified 'g' swing points.
> Because these are supposedly the exact points where the socalled
> evidence of 'new' relative gravity-photon effects are being
> detected. In short the mechanical engineering of this experiment is
> simply far too weak.
>
> This 'experiment' on the cheap leaves far to many stress vs materials
> variables to even come near the rigor of approaching the scientific
> method. The photon/wave interference pattern variance observed as
> supposedly a solid experimental result is extremely iffy & shoddy at
> best. The experiment is a great idea. But until these things are
> upgraded & corrected absolutely no valid conclusional inference can
> credibly be drawn from it. So the discussional validity at this
> juncture is merely rhetorical and virtually null.
And maybe that has something to do with why this is being aired as a
Youtube video, rather than a spectacular theory-shattering journal article.
> Even if apparatus experimental upgrades are made and the very same
> effect is observed, is this indeed evidentiary of new virtual
> graviton vs photon to virtual photon effect? Or is this simply
> another proof of theory of Einstein relativity historically
> demonstrated before by astronomic observation that gravity-well space
> warpage shifts photonic trajectory again?
That would be the Pound-Rebka experiment all over again, eh?
That's been done, of course.
> As such it would be old
> news it seems. And much of the youtube effects trying 'wow' the
> audience on the cheap tend to seem somewhat cheesy across the board.
> But some people like Gouda & some like Danish Delfino, so to each his
> own I guess. JO
>
