In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:06:30 -0400: Hi, [snip] >I posted the new blog linked at bottom after discovering a paper by Zofia >Bialynicka-Birula, The principle difference however is just this paragraph : >Both Naudts and Bourgoin used equations normally reserved for photons and >skeptics argued that 1/2 spin electrons can not occupy the same space and >state and that the fractional states would simply fall away if the appropriate >Dirac equations were used! A 1996 paper "Cavity
Since Hydrogen only has one electron anyway, I fail to see the relevance of the argument. There is no other electron to contend with for the same orbital. >QED*<http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf> " by Zofia >Bialynicka-Birula addresses this with the destruction of isotropy inside a >cavity and resulting effect on invariance under transformations of the >Poincare group which I believe supports the equation selection by Naudts and >Bourgoin. I would add that math performed from a relativistic perspective >allows electrons to occupy what appear to be the the same spatial coordinates >and states due to divergent frames of hydrogen populations at different >acceleration rates but spatially stationary, a back door way to extend the use >of the equations. >Relativistic hydrogen inside a Casimir cavity appears to have a fractional >quantum state from an external >perspective<http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-relativistic-hydrogen-inside-casimir-cavity-appears-have-fractional-quantum-state-external-perspective-25072.html> >September 11, 2009 > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
