Jones Beene wrote: > Mauro, > > > >> I wonder how much can I find when searching the deep web >> > > http://www.fravia.com/deepweb_searching.htm > > ..... It is my hope that those last links will serve also as a form of > obituary, because Fravia passed away on may 3, 2009. It's a sad day for > mankind when a genius dies. May he rest in peace. > > > > Interesting site, thanks - and it will take some time to wade through it, > but I fail to see how it relates to or explains Coperunicus' Third Law, > It doesn't :-) Just mixing some information and resources. > whatever that is - probably something to do with a spiral trajectory. That > is why I changed the "subject" line. >
All this is historical, i.e. it's documented somewhere. The first Copernican law states the rotation of the Earth around its axis. The second one states that the Earth moves around the Sun. Copernicus third law relates the movement of the rotational axis of the Earth(precession of the equinoxes) with a movement of the Sun. It says that that movement of the Sun is mostly canceled out by the slow rotation(precession) of the Earth axis of rotation, in the same way as the movement of the Earth (from the Moon's perspective), is "canceled out" by the rotation of the Moon, which always shows the same face to the Earth. This was "forgotten" in the course of time, and now we have a Copernican system with a(for all practical purposes) immobile Sun, in a similar way as we have had in the past a Geocentric system with the Earth immobile. > .... not that I am unappreciative of attempted scientific connections of all > these cosmological things to what is still mystical .... but it looks like > this one leads us into pre-War German Gnosticism - Rudolf Steiner ;-) which > has not held up well to modern scrutiny at least not in the USA ... which is > not necessarily a bad thing, come to think of it. > Yes indeed. Talking about Steiner ideas as "pre-War German Gnosticism" is a gross misunderstanding, at many levels.
