Hi Taylor,

Thank you for your comments and opinion. I can assure you that the
theory is the (by no means final) result of much thinking and serious
reflection.

I have read about Le Sage gravity, but as I said in the past, I think
the carrier of gravity is similar (or even the same) as the carrier of
electromagnetism: a form of wave, but longitudinal instead of
transverse. My recent idea is that electromagnetism, which is "carried"
by transverse waves, "converts" partially into gravity(longitudinal
waves) under the right conditions of "pressure" or density, and
interaction. The result is a kind of stationary longitudinal wave that
produces the observed effects of gravity.

Regarding particles: in my opinion, particles are the fiction, which
arises as a result of our world view, i.e. from our usual tendency and
familiarity to think in terms and ideas like those of "thing" and
"object". Protons, electrons, neutrons, etc. are for me very specific
forms of movement, in the form of waves and vortices. And that which is
moving is at the same the fabric of the world(the ether, if you like),
and its substance.

Regarding the concept of carrier particles, like photons and gravitons,
it is clear to me that, in the case of the photon, we're in the presence
of something like a pulse or wave train(a discrete number of waves), and
that we assume that wave train to be a particle, and to act like a
particle in its interactions with other "particles". Photons are mainly
travelling(propagating) waves, while electrons and protons are (mainly)
rotating ones.

So, photons are the propagation of discrete transversal wave trains, and
gravitons (if they exist) will be the propagation of forms of
pulsating(longitudinal) movement in the fabric of space, in the form of
discrete longitudinal wave trains.

Mauro


Taylor J. Smith wrote:

This is a neat theory.  I like to think that forces
are applied (mediated) by particles (a "field" is a
fiction useful for calculations).  So, gravity is a push
(by gravitons) as proposed by Le Sage -- does this
work with your theory?

Reply via email to