One curious fact emerges from a close reading of the many Arata papers
relative to what he labels as "pycnodeuterium". 

I have never seen this explicitly mentioned in a connect-the-dots fashion,
but if it has been put forward by someone else, please let me know the
citation so that proper credit can be given in the future. We may have
hinted about a Millsean connection on Vo in the past, yet Arata certainly
never mentions it; and he is probably unaware of CQM.

To backtrack, this pycno-species of Arata is NOT normal deuterium but is a
previously "activated" version of deuterium, which has already given up
quite a bit of heat in the DS cell or cathode, but has NOT yet transmuted or
fused into anything. That is a most important point, even if some trace
helium is seen. The trace Helium is many orders of magnitude too low at this
stage but some pycno can proceed to full fusion at any time. 

IOW what we see in the AZ experiments is clearly mostly deuterium which has
given up excess heat in the process of what Arata labels as temperature
inversion. It has become first activated in a matrix and then depleted, but
not transmuted or fused. To quote from the 2005 paper:

".Without D2 or without sample such as Pd fine powder, Tin never went higher
than the given temperature Tout. On the other hand, when the samples
absorbed
pycnodeuterium, then Tin was always higher than Tout, that is temperature
inversion."

For those of us who believe in the broader field of "fractional ground
states", with or without Mills - and admittedly Mills theory is incorrect in
many details - the best physical description of pycnodeuterium, which goes
well beyond what Arata is suggesting - is that the species is a fractional
ground state, having become an energy-deficient form of "shrunken"
deuterium, which has already given up lots of heat. This shrinkage also
explains the enormous interior 'self-generated' pressure which is documented
in the DS-cathode patent of 1995.

I am trying to be careful in explaining how an energy-deficient form can
also be labeled as "activated" since the activation relates to the next
stage in a two stage process; one that proceeds with increased probability
due to prior depletion. This is probably a semantic roadblock where skeptics
will try to focus criticism. 

This process begins with adsorption of D2 into a catalytic matrix, with or
without electrolysis. The dynamics of that may involve the relativistic
theory of Fran Roarty. Importantly, the alloy which is an order of magnitude
most effective for "pycno" is not palladium itself, but instead is mostly
nickel with a few percent  palladium. That rings of Mills going back to
1991.

Going further, then, what Arata Zhang discovered and documented - and
labeled as pycnodeuterium could well be the predecessor state to LENR.

Pycno may or may not be a necessary predecessor state (sine qua non) for all
forms of LENR, but the evidence bodes in that direction. This state of prior
"energy depletion" of deuterium which he labels as pycnodeuterium elegantly
explains both how "cold" fusion can proceed at lower energy input parameters
than hot fusion; the delay which is often necessary; and also the lack of
strong gammas in the aftermath. 

Stated simply, much of the expected excess energy was already given up prior
to the actual nuclear reaction, via the non-nuclear "shrinkage" reaction
which pushed it below ground state, giving up heat in the form of UV
radiation. 

That is the part that BLP got right wrt hydrogen, and hinted at, back in the
early nineties wrt cold fusion, but it took these good experiments by
Arata/Zhang to actually document the transition into two distinct steps.

Jones

Reply via email to