from overunity.com
"
Just found out Sean has been making a lot of posts at his forum recently.
Here are a few interesting posts regarding the technology,

Quote

Ok - I agree that a great way to see if the system has CEMF is to test it as
a generator - and we will be including that in the next experiment.

As for there being current through the coils when we say its turned off -
thats just nonsence, but again we will make the switch from the power supply
a lot more clear in the next one.

As for shorter and longer pulses - I assume that you are reffering to
induction losses through the interaction - and there are none (in fact there
is a greater energy returned from the field collapse than there is energy
put into the field creation) - but THAT is the next experiment, so lets see.


Quote

"Eddy currents in the core - how do you measure them"

Well you could just use a nonconducting core and then not have them at all.



Quote

"I think the main basic thing people are waiting for is the input
voltage/current along side the output voltage/current. I take it this will
be included in 2010 demonstrations?"

Yes


Quote

"That vibration does have my attention over all the other claims."

Its the nature of the bearings that we are using.


Quote

"Will you be "redoing" the experiments before or after Christmas? (Never
mind, I see you said January)"

Not sure on the date, but it will be prior to Jan 10th (we may do two
experiments together - will have to look at the practicality of this).


Quote

Ok the first sequence of experiments are about showing that in eOrbo all the
input energy goes to output as Joule heating (no back emf, no induction
losses) and yet work is still done by the rotor. The second sequence is
total input energy, total output energy and the energy of the system itself.


Quote

"Why have the demo "Orbo"s been changed out occasionally, was this due to
"issues",,, or is that in some way a future part of the demonstration?"

Its been asked (and answered) - we made a call to use reed switches - they
are across an inductive load and flyback dioide or not there is still a high
failure rate.


Quote

"You've mentioned that the overall thermodynamic efficiency of the system is
about 3X. Shall we take that to mean, that if 10W (avg./cont.) battery power
input is measured, calorimetry would indicate a heat
<http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8411.300#> flow of 30W
(avg./cont.)?"

It means that for the type of system shown to date, 1J of elec input will
produce circa 3J of output (heat, work done by the rotor and electrical) -
but again this has yet to be proven, and it will - but I will not open the
Xmas presents early".


--



On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Esa Ruoho <esaru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl5ZxPkGxmQ  some excerpts of q&a  after
> the steorn talk on 19th dec..
> this isnt in the original steorn video released by steornofficial
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Esa Ruoho <esaru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/html/steffecten.htm
>> here seems to be a simple experiment to comprehend the steorn effect. any
>> opinions?
>>
>> also it seems the original JLN labs steorn replication text is available
>> in english :) http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to