On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is ANOTHER key element WHICH Sean HAS ALSO MENTIONED, to quote him, > "...and by very careful and > specific positioning of the coils..." But then, you guys wouldn't know > that since you prefer to > spend your valuable time speculating here instead of trying to educate > yourselves. > Now now, Mark, let this not turn into another Paul Lowrance issue, where someone starts up a crusade against "those bumbling idiots on vortex-list" and gets himself banned. Let's be civil now. This is simply a case of a few people deciding that it's all smoke'n'mirrors, and therefore to devote any time to it would be a waste of time.. and then taking the time to write about how much of a scam it is. I value your input to this list, so let's not go down the road of who was bought by who, who is x and who is y. It'll only take a while for Steorn/Sean's claims to be meaningful or not. I see on another list, Rick Friedrich is already digging into Steorn being a total Bedini rip-off, you can see such conversations between Friedrich and McCarthy at: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8199-Breakthrough-Energy-Examiner~y2010m1d13-Steorn-gives-COP-gt-1-demo Again, I have no opinion on this, but have a firm feeling that Steorn have purposefully kept from immersing themselves in Free Energy -scene, they also don't know what Friedrich/Bedini have, and thus I would take the "net worth of your advice/knowledge, since you give it for 0$, is, obviously, 0$" comment from McCarthy towards Friedrich, with a pinch of salt.
