On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:58:34 -0800 Gibson Elliot Gibson Elliot wrote..
"Ether is consumed by mass, that's gravity, a pretty measurable effect in my
book!"
I agree with Tesla's observation but it is incomplete..you can't "just" eat
ether endlessly -you must also expell it.
Puthoff's atomic model has vacuum fluctuations restoring energy to orbitals and
Tesla is even more generic where
he attributes all mater to eating ether which I assume includes the electrons
and positrons in the nucleus. In both cases however there needs to be a more
dynamic definition of this interaction. The LET theory suggests a "stationary"
ether
but this "eating" and "expelling" of ether through matter heavily suggests
relative motion. The LET helps explain the M&M dilema by putting ether on the
time axis but there still needs to be some explanation of relative motion.
maybe 3D space as a whole is moving through time at C? If SR and LET are that
similar then then the C squared component of V^2/C^2 must have an anology in
LET. They both represent velocity legs of a right triangle. I am not saying
vacuum fluctuations ARE the ether but rather they are residents of that medium
and as such travel with the ether -winking into and out of existence because
they can only manifest themselves while intersecting with space. Maybe someone
can tell me the proper theory name for viewing all matter with open vistas on
both the future and past -I'm slowly learning my ideas are never my own and
that this perspective must have a commonly applied name / author. My point is
that
relative motion between space and time where VP form a stream on the time axis
would explain 1) this winking into and out of existence, 2) Puthoff's model of
restoring ennergy/Tesla's view of "eating" ether, 3)inertial frames because
this stream rate becomes our "ruler" such that we can never really be aware of
rate changes. ok ok TOOOO much speculation but at least you know now where I
am coming from... and it all started here
http://byzipp.com/energy/hydrino_files/frame.htm
