Mauro, Well, I didn't expect that... um... thanks for the sympathetic ear in a rather dismissive world. I'm actually touched, which I didn't expect. Been feeling a bit jaded lately, I guess, I needed that. I will take some time in the very near future and write up a brief summarizing my collective theories. At the moment I have some priority irons in the fire, releasing a web site for a major undertaking, by months end... Sometime in Feb, if things go smoothly. Until then...
Gibson --- On Thu, 1/28/10, Mauro Lacy <[email protected]> wrote: From: Mauro Lacy <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Michaelson Morely vs V^2/C^2 To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 6:24 PM Gibson Elliot wrote: > Re-examine the deliberate glossing over of scientific fact? Hmm > perhaps we could look at Lorentz and what he threw away to make his > equations work? > I know that LR is flawed also. I very much would like to hear your explanation. > > That's unlikely to occur, why throw out SR when you can keep chasing a > fantasy for billions of dollars year. It is not in the best financial > interest of the current pack of Space/Time theorists, String > theorists, and CERN would like get a multi billion dollar black eye. > > Lets just wait for the "GOD" particle NOT be found and see what other > absurd theory rises. I will never be able to stomach Quantuim > mechanics or any other system that violates rules simply because of > scalar effects. The whole of SR only applies to observation, it does > not prove that changing your speed effects time, except in thought > experiments, the twins theory is bogus, and cesium clocks have been > proven to change rates when you change gravity, or rather the > proximity to gravitational field center. > > Ether is consumed by mass, that's gravity, a pretty measurable effect > in my book! > Gamma is just a near final decay state of matter when run through a > grinder such as a "Black hole" which is a simple either cyclone > or what current flock refers to as "Dark Matter". I rant, and this > will all come out soon anyway. And hey without peer reviewed > materials none will take this seriously anyway, so why do I bother? > just frustration I guess. > There's no reason to be frustrated. Time for some quotes? Understanding. n. A cerebral secretion that enables one having it to know a house from a horse by the roof on the house. Its nature and laws have been exhaustively expounded by Locke, who rode a house, and Kant, who lived in a horse. Ambrose Bierce For in thy Naught I trust to find the All. Goethe. Faust. Best regards, Mauro
