At 06:59 PM 2/1/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:

Nevertheless, the paper does show "reasonable agreement" with what would be expected from d-d fusion, except for the obvious fact that simple d-d fusion is hardly considered a reasonable hypothesis by anyone. What is more to the point is a hypothesis that the fuel for whatever is going on is deuterium and the principal ash is helium, and, no matter what intermediaries exist, or what mechanism, and unless significant other products exist, the 24 MeV Q factor would be expected.

This is well expressed. It is the point I have been trying to make for many years, often to no avail.

Thanks. Eventually, they come around, Jed. For an unfortunate few, they die first.

A hazard we all face, sooner or later.

Basic rule of interpretation of incomplete messages: assume that they are mostly right, look for the explanation that maximizes rightness.

This is especially true when the text is not written by a native speaker of language. It even applies to graphs and other presentations of date, even without words. You would be surprised how many differences there are in mathematical notation and customary presentation methods there are between the U.S. and Japan for example. There are big differences and small ones. The small ones are apt to cause more misunderstandings than the big ones, because people do not realize they are there.

Right. With the assumption, one will continue digging, and only when exploration is thorough, there have been multiple efforts, including consultations with others, does it start to become reasonable to even think of "obfuscation."

I've been pretty frank about Stoern, because it became clear to me that they weren't trying to make it all clear. Indeed, they are really pretty open about that, if you just think! They don't want you to know what they are doing if you don't pay them the developer fee! How the hell do they expect to make money if they just give the ideas and the exact procedures and results away!

And then I was not thrilled to see Larsen basically acknowledging that the "understanding" they have is "proprietary." Big red flag. He's not going to explain it to us unless we pay him, and probably with even more restrictions than that. Down this road we have already seen many go, and what happened to them?

Sure, someday, someone *might* be quite legitimate, who follows this business model. But I'm not holding my breath. None of this means that W-L theory is wrong, but it sure doesn't mean it's right.

There are also authors such as Arata who use old notation and some idiosyncratic notation I have never seen elsewhere. For example, he and one Japanese publisher I encountered many years ago tends to put units in square brackets:

1 [kg]
14 [MeV]

Arata is a genius -- I am more and more impressed by his latest work. But he does not communicate well! He uses all kinds of weird typographic symbols such as letters with circles around them. The late Akira Kawasaki and I agreed that Arata's notation and symbols are confusing as heck, and his Japanese text is as confusing as his English.

To me, I'm sure, *much more confusing*!

You would be surprised how confusing & misleading language differences can be, even in daily personal life. See Jake Adelstein, "Tokyo Vice" p. 63 for details:

http://www.amazon.com/Tokyo-Vice-American-Reporter-Police/dp/0307378799

Since I am stickler for proprieties I shall say no more, but you can Search inside! for the text: "this lends itself to the joke . . ."

(I can't wait to read this book in Japanese.)

Cool. That is a fabulous joke about Japanese-American couples, I doubt that I will ever forget it. I won't reveal your secret Jed, others will just have to look for themselves. His girlfriend was right, though. He'd have made a bad husband, guaranteed, she'd have been unhappy. There was no actual misunderstanding here, though, this was just an excuse to share the joke with us. They knew what the words meant. Thanks, though.

As to the book, I can't wait to read it in English. Stupid search ends each excerpt just when it's getting really juicy!

Reply via email to