(This e-mail sent itself before it was done---here is the rest)

 

Hi Fran!

 

It is good to hear from you!  You are the first person that has dilscussed the 
temporal aspects of these cavities.   Is my description of them in the 
Relativistic-Cavities section of Self-Sheltering Plates???

 

http://z-pec.yolasite.com/resources/Self-Sheltering_Casimir-Plate.pdf

 

It would be so easy to test this whole notion by simply exposing a precise 
amount Raney Nickel to sllightly-radioactive Kr 81 gas and comparing its 
reaction-rate to the same amount of gas that was not exposed to the Raney 
Nickel.  Raney Nickel has many cavities under 20 nm.  However, it is probably 
important that the cavity walls have a certain nominal thickness due to 
skin-depth penetration issues; therefore, one might want to make a Raney Allow 
that is 50/50 molar-ratio rather than 50/50 ratio by weight as is more typical

 

Do you think the process-acceleration aspects are what cause the cavities to 
manifest a higher apparent pressure---I am really trying to understand what 
drives the so-called "Repulsive" Casimir Effect.  What actually causes the 
flux-pressure to build in these cavities:  Resonance?  Optical Pumping?  
Relativistic 

 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:A Nano-Cavity \"Rocket\" & Z-PEC Zero-Point Energy Converter
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:47:31 -0500





Wm,
I think it is a little more complicated than that although you are on the right 
track. In my opinion The trick is vacuum flux are moving on the time axis so 
from their perspective your “box” has 6 sides –they manifest while traveling 
from the future side to the past side while the other 4 sides located in 3D 
space appear flattened out to a “width” = to what we perceive as the “present”. 
Casmir “plates” can force these fluctuations to shrink, squeezing through the 
lattices to achieve “equivalent” acceleration from our perspective just like a 
large gravitational mass but on a mesoscopic scale. It is the tiny cavity 
between the plates that produces  something the macro scale cannot, ”equivalent 
deceleration”, The squeezed fluctuations accumulate a pressure behind the 
plates that is suddenly released by the cavity forming a fast moving 
vortex/venture. Instead of slowing time by opposing fluctuation flow, the 
cavity accelerates time flow.
 
You can ignore the temporal and conservation of energy aspects  if you put it 
in terms of catalytic action which really just disguises these terms but avoids 
a lot of controversy. This puts your present description on the right track, 
you have a time machine in the form of a rigid catalyst, you have the 
uncertainty principle driving gas law to keep atoms in motion, you have natures 
preference for a diatomic state and apparently you also have natures resistance 
to molecular motion in a catalytic environment but we know disassociated 
hydrogen can make a non radiative translation to fractional state. This 
suggests that a fractional molecule formed 
>From these translated atoms also opposes catalytic action (change in Casimir 
>force) so that the atomic motion of gas law provides relative motion with the 
>stationary plates producing changes in Casmir force which break the bond – It 
>is during this period while vacuum fluctuations are accumulating boundary 
>conditions in opposition to the covalent bond that the potential for 
>reactionless drive exist. The Plasma is produced at the moment of molecular 
>formation locking the atomic fractional states proportional to local plate 
>geometry, the molecule then moves based on gas law with the fractional states 
>trying to change but opposed by the covalent bond, If this “post plasma” but 
>“pre bond break” gas can be driven preferentially on one axis it may provide 
>the elusive “ether oar”.  If I had the ability to create black light plasma I 
>would put the device in a nonferrous balance scale and change the opposing 
>weights while the unit was on and compare to changing the weights while the 
>unit is off – My theory is that the “settle” time would be much slower with 
>the plasma on then off because of these increased boundary conditions.
Regards
Fran                                      
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/

Reply via email to