From: Francis X Roarty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 9:30 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [Vo]:More on Relativistic Cavities
Wm. Scott Smith said on Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:10:56 -0800 [snip] Hi Fran! I want to see if our understanding of the relativistic cavity thing is really the same. I'm not sure, but I think you or someone quoting you got me started thinking about the whole thing, but I never caught many details so maybe I have actually figured it out wrong or at least differently: Assuming a Lorentz-Invariant Flux inside the cavities requires us to accept that the same long wavelengths exist inside the cavity as outside but that some of their oscillation that can no longer take place on their 3-Di axes must be displaced onto their temporal axis with the result that processes inside the cavity appear to happen faster than the same processes, outside the cavities----a sort of inverse twin-astronaut thing where we are the slowly aging ones!----are we on the same page??? [/snip] Yes, we outside the cavity are accelerating "awhen?" as opposed to "away" from the interior of the cavity Casimir cavity The hydrogen inside and outside the cavity remains relatively stationary to each other spatially so the divergence is strictly on the time axis, this is also why it is called negative energy since the environment inside is decelerated but it is the absolute difference between the inside and outside of the cavity we are exploiting so we don't care that the interior represents a negative value - I think time flows through open space at some "nominal" value, as soon as you introduce mass the flow is infinitesimally opposed like the Puthoff model the vacuum flux have to keep that orbital pushed away from the nuclei. This opposition model may scale to explain atomic weights and suggests denser lattices structures contribute to heavier mass. When we form a cavity or plates they are flattened out from a time perspective to form a large flat single "sail" with the cavity forming a hole in the center. The "pressure" in the "sail" is too much for the little hole to exhaust and you gat a permanent ventori flow through the hole into the cavity many times faster than the "nominal" flow in wide open space. It is negative because matter normally opposes flow but here is leveraged to accelerate it past the nominal reference value. [snip] The Raney Nickel thing should be really easy to test. It is commercially available and quite inexpensive---the same thing with the Kr 81. I do think we may end up having to mix our own alloy closer to a 50/50 molar ratio instead of the standard 50/50 by weight (before leaching by Sodium Hydroxide. [/snip] Rayney nickel is pyrophoric and they will not deliver to a residential address. As far as melting alloys I already tried using an HHO torch which as you know scales to the melting point of most metals but the kit I got was only a few liters per minute and just barely melted tiny samples of nickel and it refused to mix with carbon black -if you go that route make sure to use a bubbler and flash back arrestor. I would prefer a pure hydrogen source for my purposes, either a lecture bottle or maybe an electrolysis cell with diaphragm to separate and accumulate just the hydrogen. I prefer to stay safe being the lab is in my basement so any tests have to be scaled very small for easy containment. I would like to test circulating hydrogen through different nano powders while in an inert atmosphere to see if Catalytic action/changes in Casimir force can self assemble from the inter particle packing. Maybe methane releases through fine silt on the sea floor is responsible for Bermuda triangle :_) [snip] Yes, I am aware of many articles that are talking about media-based levitation. Nonetheless, there are other experiments out there where they just plain expect high-pressure inside completely enclosed cavities or cavities with no more than one open side. But I have been at a loss to understand where they are coming from . . . [/snip] You have 2 other sides to consider the future and the past at right angles to space. The pressure you mention doesn't seem intuitive because you are releasing pressure from the plates to create accelerated time flow "inside" the cavity but this flow is many times faster than "nominal" flow of open space so when it exhausts out of the cavity into the past it represents a "temporal pressure" higher than the ambient. I have been following news on the so called EM drive which uses only "radiation pressure" no gases like some of your ides but does not use Casimir cavities. Instead they "wag the dog" using microwave energy to initiate waveguide suppression of certain frequencies -personally I think they should introduce some matter into their horn shaped device to amplify the effect but that might kill their RF transmission paths. Regards Fran
