Hello Jack Thanks for toning down the CAPs prose.
You seem to be aware of the fact that your writing has a tendency to barrage the reader with a lot of confusing terminology - some of that terminology, I confess, I've never hear of. One needs a Harbach-O'Sullivan glossary in order to understand all the "yadda-yadda" stuff. However, you are aware of your short comings and that makes points in my book. Nobody is perfect! Certainly not me. As Terry has previously commented, I too have a difficult time following the flow of your logic. I hasten to add, however, that my own intellectual predilections tend to gravitate towards mythic interpretations. To compensate, I often try to communicate with my fellow colleagues by following the rules of linear oriented techno-speak in order to stay grounded. I see a lot of personal interpretation of what reality is supposed to be made up of in your prose. My perception of what you're writing strikes me less as scientific theory or hypothesis in the making, and more as modern mythic interpretations of our perceptions of reality, where you use a rich word-salad of technical terminology to couch the mysterious underpinnings of Mother Nature. I hasten to add that writing in the style of modern mythic prose is NOT in itself a bad thing. Far from it. Problems only occur when mythic interpretation (which IMHO are just as valid a perception as scientific interpretations) get confused as being a scientific interpretation. IMHO, we need... our society needs both perceptions in order to evolve. They need each other. BTW, I'm a recovering dyslexic. I constantly battle against inflicting turgid prose amongst my potential readers. Some days... some posts are better than others. You have my sympathies. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
