Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/


--- On Fri, 3/19/10, Harvey Norris <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Harvey Norris <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Vo]:Pi factor
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:18 PM
> The energy transfer between L and C
> as stored joules by the quantities;
> J= .5 CV^2 and J = .5 LI^2
The quandary here is the fact when we measure either I or V by meter means, 
this displayed value is the rms or averaged, and the true peak  value is 
therefore 1.4 times the reading. However even after making this corrective 
manipulation of indicating true values, the comparison to actual energy 
transfer over time falls short by pi times the amount of supposed energy 
transfer. Here perhaps semantics, or wording of the involved process of 
description might explain this apparent discrepancy that has long bothered me. 
When we speak of energy transfer OVER TIME; the amount of energy being 
transferred {in time itself] is only at a peak at a certain instant of time, 
and therefore by using that derived peak value as the total amount of energy to 
be transferred in time itself, a different answer is arrived at. The true 
analysis should include the fact that the amount of energy being transferred 
over time is itself not constant,(we need calculus) and in fact it
 can be itself zero at certain time measurements of the time interval itself as 
a cycle being measured. I am now wondering if this is the explanation for the 
discrepancy of joules/sec vs wattage measurements in comparison for equal 
energy transfer resonant circuits.
> and considering The I^2R heating loss of the inductor
> itself; when the transfer of energy between L and C as
> joules/sec becomes equal to the inductor heat loss wattage,
> by the inductor displaying a Q factor of 3.14; the
> oscillation of energy between the fields has become Pi times
> greater then its ordinary reactive state.
> HDN
> Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 




Reply via email to